LATEST UPDATES
Publications; Correspondence and Drafts
Item
- Title
- Description
- Date
- extracted text
-
Publications; Correspondence and Drafts
-
box: 570
folder: 12
-
1963
-
WPR
Re:
1.
NOTE
FOR
IRV AND
SATURDAY
EVE
ARTICLE
Changes
need to be made
NAT
in the light of the partial text ban agreement.
2. Growing sharp and deep division between the Soviet Union and Red
China should be further emphasized and point ought to be made that this
presents us with an historic opportunity and that if we can launch a peace
offensive in the magnitude that we propose, this ultimately would compel
Red China to go along in view of the fact that living standards of the
emerging nations would rise rapidly and that this would exert great
pressure in China internally.
3.
We should further expand and emphasize the need for full employment
as it bears upon race relations.in America -- specific emphasis on the
high level of unemployment among Negro youth.
July 25,
1963
July 31,
Mr.
B.
Thomas
Congdon,
Associate
Editor
New York
19,
Dear Mr.
Congdon:
1963
Jr.
The Saturday Evening Post
666 Fifth Avenue
New
York
It occurred to Mr. Reuther that in the light o:
recent developments on the national and international scene
the article "Freedom's Margin of Survival~-A Strategy for
Peace" might require further re-writing.
The partial test ban agreement and the growing
sharp and deep division between the Soviet Union and Red China
are matters which should be dealt with briefly but with emphasis.
It would be well, moreover, to include a sentence
or two concerning the need to create a full employment economy
as it bears upon race relations in America with special emphasis
on the high level of unemployment among Negro
youth
Pursuant to our earlier discussion, we are awaiting
the "boiled down" version of the article which we feel can be
modified by the addition of a few sentences to make the points
noted above.
I would appreciate your comments.
Sincerely,
IBimp
ceiu 42
Irving Bluestone, Administrative
Assistant to the President
Pe Be
®
a
apm
RE
Silat
soni
4k
elles
chen
Eecekee
ni
gai
i
a
a
ee
:
a
i a
re
ae
ca al
lk
a
a
'
j
SS
a
he
eat a
:
aad
TT Ee
ee
e
i
ee
ee
ee
ee
f
ae
f
E
jor
Ah
Preset
Bu.
a
li,
é é
ee ee
ee
Long negotiations
of nuclear
have
disarmament.
The
longest part
of the
To
the
sides
when
of an
ban
bombs
of
he
first
fruit
—
for feace ge nourt’shed
tne world's bie
edge
the
oD
ti eco naaayupbe ne
the
borne
told
test
journey
the
testing
Iron
the
wana
ahead,
step
Meyer
RE
Re
ass aa
oh
\
e
Lor ee
OR Sa Elis
CN SSE
by more
in
and we
the
are
°
Re
we
i
et
has
ey
ii
diac
Las
<aoe
ee
Oe
substantial
right
still
on the
Choe
:
* es
agreements
direction.
groping
testing
Yet
forward
on
the
along
ee
of the
dismantled
Curtain
United
ban
lies
abyss.
are not
the
partial
of a partial ban
bombs
and
will
is not
destroyed
share
the
am
to ban
under
the
bembs.
acceptable
anxiety
And
safeguards,
expressed
by
Nations:
:yo
Set
else.
ees
as
we
long
men
President
as
on
ntl
Kennedy
move
us beyond
disarmament
manently
the
first
negotiations,
step
and
of the
keep
the
evil
genie
ban,
break
of nuclear
|
bottled.
world's largest o- waeuetions
partial Fest
:
the
deadlock
catastrophe
in
per—
New
or both, as wae the case in the
ious
Failure
Cat
veueeiieeesiee
life
from
maining
to
threatened
face
can we
What
mankind
the
quik
to take
able. 2e aes
avoid
deadlock
datm
o tha
e pag
rtiee
s, and, in
of
learn
this
our
from
fate?
in Geneva?
Gin
nae
with
the
3
atmosphere
veeted.c
damage
in
in Geneva
breakthrough
test-ban
PRM Ay gl
ultimate
of human
elimination
- the
We
of impasse,
planet.
collective
How can
What
bargaining
we,
finally
can be done
despite a mutual interest in reaching
accord,
ammemky remain largely captive
a
of the
advantage
and
completely,
in a situation
agreement,
of mutual
as
suspicions
break
where
evidenced
and
may
that
negotiations
both
by the
help
the
re-
parties,
partial
previously
test-
prepared
Te avoid what could have been a very serious
eaiinineer
nana Re
is eit east
—
——
ee,
SS
a
eee
ee
E
that ;
y;r
o
vert
pol
aada
squ
Soviet Union we are losing our lead in
race
lett
we a
th
dollars in wealth that :
eppertunity.
A
i
NE
ie
:
oN
=
ss
IT, a
= 10
~il-
green
the
hard-pressed
those
lands
to resist
less
Asiatic
under
participation
growing
in
pressure
the
peace
@ position
te
am economic
assistance.
'
negotiate
friendship
of resistance
to
The
Chinese
the
Red
the
to
Cemmunists.
periphery
of Red
infiltration
And as the
reached
news
the
Its
and more wash
of rising
Chinese
development
Anil
concessions
Chinese
would
living
villages,
offensive
people
aggression.
or”
program.
Pop. oy
and
our
would
render
standards
would
bid
China
thus
damaz
serve
in
then
exchange
beth
our
find
for
be
wed tt
from Red
would
We
in
determined
Peking
jiiax
wr
peace
successes
China
+
foes
waiters
for
on
effensive
Er fr_
Chinese
Chinese
neighbors
ot B®
standing
to
aggression.
by their
the
countries
vulnerable
R Chinese
amym achieved
itself
mememe | azainst
for
long-
in
economy,
we “give away” in aid only what we would not
n
i
t
a
t
h
t
c
s
i
a
f
e
h
T
.
it away
This would give rise to a second wave
goods and services that would, im a chain reaction, create still
workers rmoved from idlen
ine
tos
ths
e
which would also yield more tax rey
new
of
demanc
Perhaps
most
social
employment
full
Moumiin validate
The
Negre
and
are
there
offensive
carry
will
us
futile
the
beyond
scarcity ;3ancnmm
labor
of our
to
Meanwhile,
Unemployment
while
transform
the
among
joblessness
or about
percent,
Negre
become,
our necks
enough
five
as
has
Secretary
in the worldwide
more
teen-agers
Negro
times
been
the
double
has
recently
rate.
struggle
Rusk
the
that
than
over-all
State
from
sufferer
for the
preducts
These
regime
of whites
been
hovering
economic
of
scarcity.
since
around
statistics
1955,
30
carry
inflicted on the Negro in the United
The injustices
of
demand
up
abundance.
greatest
the
is
Negroes
among
inte
scarcity
a heavy weight of meaning.
States
create
a mirage
divide
to
trying
of
of
The peace
to work.
enterprise
mmdansm
remain
will
equal..."
created
equality
without
heritage
and able
willing
ke:
are
men
"all
that
opportunity
ef economic
equality
for all Americans
jobs
full
his
into
come
never
can
American
opportunity;
economic
until
the
proposition
American
central
of
environment
finally to
are
if we
is kine indispensable
which
economic
that
create
would
overcome
thus
deficiencies
the
and
thus generated
thrust
economic
the
importantly,
told
against
the
Congress,
Communism.
a ail letene
around
y
an
mp
co
ac
y
ma
as
e
nt
wn
ona
at
th
e
on
nt
ma
nt
si
St.
ns
ra
ee
ae
pa
d
an
r
wa
uf
e
st
wa
es
ra
le
be
sm
e
th
r
o
t
r
o
,
r
a
W
d
l
o
C
e
th
te use them in
conformity, a community
economic
aid pales
into insignificance
|
beside
ie
wh
ll
mi
l
ee
st
w
ae
a
r
fo
d
ai
se
fu
re
ld
to whether we ghou
af a world
community
ree
a eT eS ee
PO
Ce ee
ee
ee
ee a ee
AUG 13 1963
EDITORIAL
THE
ASSOCIATE
f?
SATURDAY
EVENING
666
es"
JR.
B.CONGDON,
THOMAS
OFFICES
Px
EDITOR
5 g
NEW
LS
FIFTH
YORK
August
Dear
Mr.
12,
}
2
9
Poe
AVENUE
CITY
19
1963
Bluestone:
Here at last is the somewhat condensed version of Mr. Reuther's article, with the kind of direct lead -- stating the hard-core theme of
the article in the very first line -~ that the format of Speaking Out
I've sold the editors on the piece, and if Mr. Reuther likes
requires.
Of
it substantially as it now stands, we will be proud to purchase it.
course,
tenee
we are willing
or paragraph
Mr.
to negotiate,
Reuther
as the
considers
saying
goes,
inappropriate.
over any sen-
We are accepting the article with the understanding that you'll be good
enough to give us a sentence or two to complete the second paragraph on
We'd like to pay now and
But that need not delay payment.
page 12.
We still need to cut at least 30 lines, by the way, and
amplify later.
hope you'll give us some help.
7
=
May
I hear
from you
soon?
Sincerely,
Mre Irving
UAW
Solidarity
Bluestone
House
8000 East Jefferson Avenue
Detroit 1), Michigan
TBC sal
Ene
THE
CURTIS
PUBLISHING
COMPANY
pei
cs cael
:
wales
ERS
oe]
WE CAN FORCE-PEACE ON THE RUSSIANS
|
~~
By Walter P. Reuther
|
|
eo
We can make the Russians disarm,
|
This statement,
seem
|
preposterous
Our
reason
because
the
only possible
tells
us
many
that
way
from annihilation,
imagine
ow
of us,
to
yet
disarmament
disarmament
save
ae
A, Fae
at first glance, may
rT?
Tana
deep
within ourselves, have already given up.
2
So
foe
De
The
an
(ona
yn Ta Seep
is
humanity
|
few of us really
could
ever
take place.
The recently signed nuclear test ban
proves
that
the test
1D
such
defeatism
ban is not
disarmament;
a very modest
first
tinue
to pile
up nuclear
since
Premier
untarily
step.
or
agree
is wrong.
Both
But
it is only
sides
con-
weapons.
ea
will
Je aa
never vol~
» we
need
2
fresh, bold strategy to force him to disarMe
There
is,
-- a plan
I believe,
fer
new and powerful
the
-- not
contest
increase
nations.
The strategy,
S greatest
%
to
the
It injects
factor into
a doubling
in aid
mst » pits maximum
eee
a stpedeey|
"waging peace."
an entirely
fold
25
such
but
a twenty-
world's
emergent
as any sound
strength
weakness.
against
oeraeeey
the
|
|
be
-
9 point on 10
America's great strength is its unused
industrial capacity.
potential
in our
There
is
factories,
tremendous
machine
shops
and assembly lines now running only part
ef the
time~-in
example,
our
steel
industry,
for
¢
now operating at \43)per cent of
capacity.
.
And
er
fe
there
is
in the
unused
pacity
of the millions
Three
enormous
)
wd
ee
ue
VY
potential
and productive
ca=-
of unemployed
recessions
rf. it
Ameri-
and
ocd
can workers.
skills
oN
ane
}
9
at<
:
|
oe
dal uaahemenicliaten
——
se
:
ms
ONE
point on 10
t's|
Dom
©
Exec
Fyac
on
in =pegX
TEXT
<—————— Elite TEXT
{
|
rt
|
:
rising
us
plateaus
25 million
of unemployment
manzyears
have
of labor
ue
and
$600 billion in lost wealth during the |
Cn
past
ten
years.
potentials
Premier
can
this
of the
economy.
ready
stretched
races
and
Wenee
of the
at the
we
dis-.
do
We
by
is
al-
to meet
arms
the
we
and
Soviet
can
take
economic
stress
on
the
economy. |T
mie
challenging
compete
with
develoriennt
would
strug-
strategy,
unused
Soviet
this
to
Our
in which
weak-
needs
drawing
our
its
and
the
further
economic
nations.
space
time
of
of
Khrushchev
peaceful
is
able
people.
overstrained
propose that
emerging
move
the
economy
Soviet
impose
is
Soviet
same
advantage
to
what
It
the
a contest
Premier
will
Union?
of
into
already
that
taut, barely
consist
strength
the
The
acne
maximum
awesome
a genuine
strength,
requirements
Union
Force
toward
Soviet
gling
Sai
these
agreement.
Against
the
be the,
Khrushchev
armament
ness
Harnessed,
put
us
of
our
|
in
the
faith
Cn
NO
in freedom on the line, confident that
.
by promoting
the
:
economic
9 point on 10
advancement of —
~w
On
scien
prnnreaneiaanie
»
ye
Lega
Same
me
a ="
Pate a
ed S
§
¢
te
ime S
wT
\
j
Elite TEX1
¥o
eye
vs
*
.
‘these
‘the
struggling
future
of
The first
nations
freedom
step
we
would
in the
assure
world.
in our peace
strategy
would be publicly and dramatically
to
commit
the
United States
long-range
program
of
the
seme
ward
program
large
a massive
of economic
enough
to
underdeveloped
a breakthrough
growth.
to
move
Specifically,
a
the countries
world
into
aid,
steadily
to-
self-sustaining
I propose
that
vel
commit an average of $20 billion a year
to
this
We
might
purpose
not
effectivély
be
at
over
the
able
to
the
be needed
as
some
aid.
toward
of
the
own economic
tba:
ly
commit
economic
use
were
And perhaps less
the
and
NO
S|
intended
much
the
prepared
would
end of the period
countries
momentum.
ourselves
years.
before
properly
to
acquire
But we
—
their
should
earmarking
|
flat-
for
aid an average of $20 billion
a year over the whole period,
when
25
that
beginning,
recipient countries
for massive
next
where
it
can best
—
to be spent
accomplish
the
objectives.
9 point on 10
This commitment would be coupled with
_M
fi neem
i
anctoremeneansnnerenc tent
io
$
“
——— Exec TEXT
— Elite TEXT
i”
mr
gm
eC
C
C—
/
iC
.
to
shift the men,
Preeti
5
|
by
the
peaceful
ment.
machines
military
work
of
we
would
But
and ma thriela
cutback
world
to
economic
make
it
the
develop-
clear
that
we
would not wait for Premier Khrushchev 's
agreement,
that
we
mediately with
10%
fensive.
1S
hands
and
only
three
(2) accept
living
in
serious
disarmament
Cy
agreement
the
have
with
our
whether
emerging
challenge
to:
it by
of
the
countries;
reducing
Russian
the challenge,
efforts
permit
—
and obtain the
the
people;
but meet it
to negotiate
agreement--for
would
in our
contest between freedom
to meet
or (3) accept
of-
would
ponder
would
standards
through
Khrushchev
be
he
the
resources
would
Confronted
tyranny
aid pro-
a peace
choices.
(1) default the
and
peace,
initiative
Premier
challenge,
im-—
be a declaration of
aggressive
The
proceeding
our own massive
gran. [Mats would
peace--an
were
him
only
to
a
such
stay
an
in
the
contest by diverting resources from the
epee omnenssamisaton nn tere
E ec
ex
our
os
TE
ic XT
3
Elite TEXT
a
arms
ay
petition _in-ecoreomic—devetepricnty—
It
is
obvious
that
Price
ricnthey
|
could not default the contest. We would
be
challenging
waging
he
the
peace
professes
system
chev
him
so
he
not
lands,
have
where
to bed hungry
on
very
arena
his
to ours.
And
social
s, khnrush-
is
going
to bury
to do
it
in the
have-
people
of the
most
and where
Com-
fails
Communism
If
go
poverty
human
forging
in
where
i vs
it
areas,
with us
that
power.
political
in those
the
every night
counts
munism
compete
loudly
Sea
will
us,
into
in
is Superior
knows
to
to become
is doomed
a diminishing force in the world. Khrushchev
choice
but
Obliged,
an economic
Khrushchev
as
the
successors
and his
to
then,
to
contest,
find
contest
basis--with
stay
the
the
would
the
in
compete
where
game.
United
on
So
States
long
present
the
|
in
Premier
would
|
devoting
approximately $3 billion a year
KR
us
with
resources?
proceeds
no
have
6 bon
military aid and Premier Khrushchev
com-
mitting
a billion--he
petition,
_ But
most
what
as he does,
crucial
if we
to
raise
nations
serious
While
our
not
economy
we have
idle
men
and
of
suffer
from
food
they
machinery
unused
of
and
problems
have
and
to
starved
we
the
do
their
have
sur-
Russians
And
their
compounded
their
fertilizer
of
meet
of voth.
are
strain.
Russians
While
fiber,
slack,
resources
the
plans.
by
by
anything
shortages
agricultural
cause
to
additional
is marked
machines,
and their
pluses
an
is marked
great
have’ enough
needs
commitment
trouble.
economy
Soviet
While
interests.
Then Premier Khrushchev will
in
the
com-_
and call upon other
to provide
$5 billion?
be
in
in a few
Soviet
our
$20 billion a year,
free
stay
especially
if he concentrates
his aid heavily,
areas
can
in
be-
farms
order
of
to
stay
in the arms race.
Premier
upon
belts
fense
the
Khrushchev
Soviet
to pay
against
people
for
the
can
to
nuclear
"threat
successfully
tighten
weapons
of the
call
their
in de‘ ub
ceaa
Wall
ee
aioen
saben
eas
om
yi rater:
uve
“a noeRantanmtomtmeainacmeaRanae
tobe ¥
ILA
Fm Ne eyes
LAC
mone
uxt EN
bat
ten,
ESS
ay
on
aye gm gen
i
; oe
‘
17
if }
iV
_ Street warmongers."
believe,
however,
@ gambler
calling
to
‘ther
drastic
omic
aid
there
iet
the
over
living
enough
of |
consequences of
people
to
for
in
austerity
econ-
the
Sov-
measures,
hopes
standards
fur-
Already
disturbances
dampened
for
pay
countries.
new
that
is
Russian
other
strictures
he
sacrifices
been
Union
higher
the
to
have
that
risk
upon
It is difficult to.
that
for
the
Premier
hod
Khrushchev, promised.
This
leaves
Khrushchev
our
this
ad
of
arms
for
a cut-back
can
He,
like
stalemate
reduce
Thus
Premier
on the
But
meet
Soviet
cannot
us,
is/4
of
Premier
alternative
to
he
but
arms
do
terror.
armaments
of fool-proof
unless
Khrushchev
to
seek
reduction
|
disarmament.
again,
Khrushchev
(Nn
no
ultimate
Here
NO
resources
does.
have
agreement
seek
the
the
side
other
would
and
find
unilaterally.
Neither
;
way
establishment.
prisoner
‘a
one
challenge:
military
the
to
only
at
seems
first
glance,
to have
reduction
on
Premier
choices.
a basis
He
|
could
9 point on 10
which
w“
*
ins
,
:
as
nant sienentrssneannieccrs samwmmscananennimnntiaatoawmimarraetmmsamnsncremin — I Bi
etaeeeemecore \ ‘ies asin
tt
ee
2
we
oo
ee
eR NR
A ARERR
BRAEMAR
ARNO
Nettie
yy
—
i
oy
~~
Pf
A"
hoo f
Elite TEXT
®
®
would maintain the present relationship
Cy
between his potential for overkill and
ours,
but
Or
could
he
on a lower-level
seek
reduction,
‘tion
for
however,
the
ewe
net
him by our
as
we
we
could
total
peace
the
by
adding
Soviets
and
their
This would
compel
ment
on
arms
for
Premier
seek
total
race.
Fa
Lae
-
{)
Nu?
“
United
the
Soviet
against
the
the
the
as
re-
thus
upon
econ-
seek agree=
to
stay
The only real answer
therefore,
coupled
creation
peace
Union
the
pressure
reductions
disarmament
Nations
of
them to
Khrushchev,
means--possibly
on
overstrained
omy.
for
For,
to our aid program,
competitive
solu-
expenditures,
part
the
in the peace
Arms
posed
tighter
up
further
sides.
real
offensive.
screw
leased resources
no
problems
the
economy
steppin
be
our military
turn
both
disarmament.
would
economic
reduced
Soviet
total
for
of
force--to
well
possitility
of
as
is to
with
a
some
strong
sateguard
ourselves
Communist
Chin-
ese aggression.
This proposal
strategy will
for a positive
peace
inevitably meet with objec-
eee
?
|
}
So
15 mesmo
se cliadlslauicteesinaton
eee
|i
DC
foePeom pm
Ln we
int
10
IT
ee aie a auls
ieXT:
tw
Flite LEX
ts
LO
which
were
later
proved
@ year
considered
before
going
badly
capacity
of
vehemently
that
the
the
after
boasted
Allies,
I proposed
war
|
manufacturing
industry
executives
argued
this
impossible
be-
industry
was
their
to
be
they
Wwf}
YS IRAZE
.«’
y
the
haa
were
machinery
converted.
n
military
plants
single-purpose
Harbor,
that
the
Top
not
four-fifths
with
insisted,
Pearl
example,
Harbor,
idle
A
15
For
auto
with
could
by many,
the
that
they
equipped
Pearl
of
production.
cause,
in practice.
for
conversion
10
out
impractical
Some
4é
time
;
auto
executives
converted
of their machinery
about
to arms
production.
In
1950,
peace
I proposed
offensive
of the
Peace
brushed
the
Peace
our
most
;
novation
which
Corps.
a plan
for
included
This
idea,
off as impractical.
Corps
is
successful
since
the
Marshall
the
concept
too,
pa:
was
a
Met) ted
recognized
foreign
8 total
as by
far!
policy in-
Plan.
||
|
|
on
y point on
9
noint
10
1U
————
the
massive
plement
the
propose.
~*~
from
ican
peace
Such
those
ormous
economic
aid
required
strategy
a reaction
who
do
not
productive
economy.
to
which
I now
can be
Actually,
of
the
|
expected
comprehend
potential
im-
the
en-
the Amer-
investment
of $20 billion in the waging of the peace
would
eeovide
a greatly
demand,
American
needed
for
in trucks,
thrust.
economic
aid
tractors,
economy
with
It would
increase
would
given
tools
be
and
other
money.
in
not
and
goods,
the
The $20 billion is hardly one-third
what
we
are
losing
of unemployment
oo
and
Gity.
The
under
this proposal,
to
now-idle
fabricate
elopment
satisfy
give
goods
would
rise
and
reaction,
the
their
to
men
of
still
workers
capa-
who,
be put
to work
economic
dev-
needs.
wave
that
a result
women
their
second
create
and
tools
as
productive
would
family
a
year
idle
spend
services
newly-employed
this
of
earnings
This
of
in
more
jobs.
would
have
>
would
demand
would,
to
for
a chain
The
incomes
Le
tories
that
profits
employed
which would
them would
have
also yield more
more
tax
|
industrial
for
funds
more
and
revenues
fac-
and the
to pay taxes;
out of which
expansion.
S
f
/
/ Critics
at least
of the
at the
proposal
outset,
will
say
that,
:
a $20-billion
ae
sae
|
é
aid
program
dollar
they
‘the
would
hike
will
in
before
the
ask,
program
mean
national
will
during
a multi-billion-
we
debt.
get
those
the
Where,
money
first
for
few years
the spurt takes place?
My answer
is simply that . . . (TO KUM)
Karlier
General
this
year
a committee
Lucius
Clay
submitted
President
report
a report
contented
aid program
too many.
be
raised
vastly
on
its
NO
cedes
eign
This
contention
an argument
the
head.
that
program
argument
The
the
aid.
present
“attempting
expanded
Unhappily
our
is
as
to
on foreign
that
under
limited
too much
for
will doubtless
against
here
the
proposed.
stands
the
Clay
Report
itself
72 percent
of our
total
assistance
The
appropriations
this
truth
con-
forfs
LF
7
year
‘a
ety
ey
poms
ie terme pomnennninnrennnnercnnenemeenres = K EXC
ee
en iieasieniiedihhstaneenitninsninaeaniniitenaann:
j
j
i
»
,
4
a oy
On
rrr
f EX |:
Elite TEXT
ane
ent
10
13
consists of military and military-supporting
assistance.
a billion
‘the
3S
This
dollars
nonmilitary
word
gasping
leaves
no more
in economic
needs
for
of
help.
an
aid to
too little
As
more
objective
aid
against
few"
“attemptbecomes
description
inadequacies
starkly
our
of
our
EE
that
highlighted
by
successful
aid
most
comparison
are
with
undertaking,
the
While that Plan was in
operation,
our
éontribution
an average
of $11.85 annually for each
reached
amounted
by
it.
Last
to
coun-
year,
our
total
foreign
assistance,
including
that
Support
of
programs,
came to —
military
in
only $1.85 per person in all underdeveloped
countries
&@ per
aid
outside
capita
programs
of the
Cn
current
Marshall Plan.
rte
nN
a
program
person living in the 16 European
£U
the
program.
The
15
for too
meet
underdeveloped
imperatives of the situation,
ing
than
amount
shall Plan.
basis,
have
the
Communist
our
present
shrivelled
we provided
to
under
bloc.
On
conduit e
a
sixth
the Mar-
(And this is to say nothing
}
y.
SE camivascsiidomuesiitane
f
tite
Se
m=
er
2
a OR NERIS
T LN
A
8 NAR
IIe mt
AR
AORN
ye
cviiactenns Cbin
NE
Xx
Co
eee
ve.
>
Elite
Cc
omy gene
i
CW
~
\
wry
i
4
iLlAG
-
TFj
.
14
of price
plan.)
changes
moreover,
pressing
than
by
offensive
But
the
ment
the
entail
its benefits
aid
is
to
total
peace
sdininiseras |
occasional
the
them,
LEP.
if
a
some
-
countries
sone eeee
of
like
underlies
more
Plan.
and
problems,
Speeuai
the
waging
inefficiencies
which
of
Marshall
will
these
are
those
Obviously,
tive
the days of that
The needs of the underdeveloped
ona)
Papiored
since
/
SV
be
impoverish-
will
gn
waste.
yield
to
Pe
a A
effective
fairly distributed
and
among
the
masses of the recipient nations. These
Caw
peace ne
:
reforms
Will) be far-mere rapidly achieved
once
truly
begin
to
effective
show
countries
development
programs
results
a few
dramatic
where
the
political
in
setting
is
favorable.
The
| th
}
j
eviden
dl ce
hope
heir
that
economyes
tf-ree
ent
:
sich
do
Ne
years encourages|
”a
nations,
even
notXexactly
whe
mivror
>
our
eastont
The Clay Report calls for withholding
aid
from projects,
no matter how essential,
that
do not
to
ern.
Yet
with
seohomic
conform
emerging
president
IBM,
ment
of basic
such
ry
erence
do
nations,
not
cS
exactly
Communist
We
ND
years
are
mirror
"New
Watson,
and —
than
the evidence
the
their
our
dictate
govern-
facilities
encourages
when
J.
more
nations."
even
will
Thomas
need
faced
an adherent
recognizes:
nations
ownership
which
as
underdeveloped
of recent
may be
As so stanch
do more developed
bene Ton
nations
enterprise
of
economic! pati=
necessities
other patterns.
of private
our
own,
hope
that
economies
will
resist
encroachment.
at
a place
in
history where
a)
‘the
pragmatic
idealist
practical
realist.
seemingly
take
are,
in
the
fact,
social
one
a “hard line"
union
the
its
knows
by
tompeting
able
of
rising
ducing
we
war
he
right?
confident
the
take
act
that
the
several
short
Com-
visit
our
above
can
and
effort
and
view,
interest.
use of
in
time
we
are
cannot
of
think
need
i
pro-
make
I am
to make
Despite
those
sense
our
peace.
so.
boldly.
our
incap-
full
we
of
as
employ-
that
victories
United
full
when
and
the
groups
only
we do not
with
sotiety
selfish
attain
trade
hours
to
free
I don't
Premier
four
pressure
expansively
occasional
which
with
his
resources
comparable
Is
of
unwilling
than
production
for
are
of
spent
depicted
full
economic
I
during
torn
ment,
hands
better
Together
He
believes
the
power.
colleagues,
Premier
who
on Communism
they
out
this
States.
us
into
injustice
Khrushchev.
the
the pressing problems and
pound ort builds
No
become
often] those
Communists ybecause
the
a
Too
playing
to deal with
He
has
of
:
who
9 point on 10
urgency
aoniarrenemscnenaiaesinaoiin
eciresemaetoiTe
oe meoeiinnne aan
”
a ana tg
a imeem
rood
4,
thet Nivim
Soar #% Sr ee
Fae
ad
fnew
TEYT
tr
E bwt
®
lite TEXT
i: e
16
seems
to be building.
increasingly
crisis
to
one
in
where
are
we
to
kina
hold
back
ready,
of
day
ready
from
long
the
Simple
in
not
day,
exist half
peace
secure
in
and
the
which
be-
of
point
initiative
move
abyss.
the
in his
warned
free
that
and
freedom
a world
do
man-~
We
are
foundations
men
can
freedom.
Lincoln,
wisdom,
to
Con-
sense
the
nuclear
have both bread aa
Abraham
our
enough
community
and
really
seize
to lay
from
Cubas
reached
to
seems©
adrift
new
has
I believe,
a world
to
I think
fact,
it
nation
events
unmanageable.
urgency,
and
unwilling
crisis--into
gos--until
come
The
half
profound
America
half
cannot
fed
and
bui
could
slave.
be
To-
made
half
starv-
ing.
asevmmervamnamstaninin
cn
gees
i
trae
YY
Ce
crt
Nae Naw
TEYT.
4
hued \
ICAL
*
lt is expected that underutilization of arent
million
will result in the loss of 55 ~ 60
prestasing
|
facilities im the Gaited States
a
U.
S.
Wastes
55
si
60
My
SLT
e ow
For the week ended August 10, 1963, the steel ind
tons of steel or at the rate of 57 percent of estim: ted capacity.
is usually below normal in July and August because of vacation.
.8
70
ed
ll
ta
to
10
t
s
u
g
u
A
h
g
u
o
r
h
t
63
19
r
fo
n
o
i
t
c
u
d
o
r
p
l
ee
St
io
ll
mi
0
10
h
c
a
e
r
to
ut
tp
ou
s
'
r
a
e
y
ll
fu
e
th
s
t
c
e
p
x
e
i(Bnduussitnreyss Week 8-3-63)
Suction
:
milli
ee
.
ooRCE
GW:eh
oeiu42
. a
&
Steel eumediion= Mecch 2 1963
ag
ae
Qs
<>)
ated
osama
Ania’
a
August
TELEGRAM
16,
1963
Thomas B. Congdon, Jr.
Associate Editor
Saturday Evening Post
666 Fifth Ave.
New
York
19,
N.
Y.
Will be in New
Suggest meeting
Mr.
Reuther's
your
office
York
Tuesday,
1 PM.
to make
please
confirm.
final the draft of
you
Irving
oeiu
42
20th
article.
Could
IB/ba
August
Bluestone
- Item sets