LATEST UPDATES
President Lyndon B. Johnson, correspondence
Item
- Title
- Description
- Date
- extracted text
-
President Lyndon B. Johnson, correspondence
-
box: 369
folder: 4
-
1966 to 1968
-
COVERING
Bk
The
MEMORANDUM
President
Model
Cities
Continue
program.
Genius
and
leadership--this
to provide
in providingthe
bi
in developing
sirokididl iaxaneaicn
to get
tools
harmonize
is its
system
of AMerican
and
programs
supplement {e€ public
moving.
to harness
capacity
of the
capabilities
the
Cities
Model
part
is an essential
to
sector
private
cidade
achievement
goals.
o.
useful,effective
the
most
brought
America
citizens
4,
corporation
housing
Non-profit
and
in assuring
a living
in a free
environment
that
skill will be
managerial
and
on the task of rehabilitating
and building
A National
and
most
the
provide
instrument
technology
advanced
to bear
flexible
would
rebuilding
worthy
of
society.
Non-Profit
Housing
fulfillment of mobilizatimof
Corporation
private
can
resources
assure
and
can
achieve
the scale of operation and the volume which are
the key
to achieving
and
the
substantial
dramatic
reduction
and
meaningful
the
breakthroughs
in cost of high quality
housing.
Covering
corporation
non-profit
and
creative
isolation because
and
managerial
the
national
Local
the
groups
scale
volume
of their
and
operation
to creating
technology.
The
National
the
is limited
a market
reduction
achieve
in
competence
the
is precisely
lack technological
cost
can
to get moving
service
provide.
tremendous
markets
groups
This
would
not only
own
groups(thousands)--but
skills.
group
constructive
lack technological
they
of local
their
can generate
local
difficult for
extremely
creation
and put in motion
which
forces
Potential
momentum.
stimulate
can
Corporation
National
2
page
Memorandum...
competence
to achieving
essential
to realize
of full application
Corporation
scale
and
but
of advance
by combining
volume
the
needed.
local
Dear
Mr.
1967
3,
Draft/...May
President:
In your
Poverty
you
1967
message
to the Congress
on Urban and Rural
said:
"T intend
to call together
an outstanding
group
the
country--from
business
every
to encourage
rehabilitation
efficient
scale
of a large
development
labor,
and
examine
the institutions
of establishing
means
possible
industry--to
and the building
government
the
across
from
citizens
of private
industry.
rebuilding
systems
our
cities
the
and
most
urgent
to this
technology
advanced
in
modern
most
the
and to bring
to find
that exists
market
enormous
the
to tap
the best ways
Americans
of outstanding
group
"T will ask this
task,"
I urge
the White
House
the
tto consider
corporation.
you
this
at the earliest possible
organization
Backed
corporation
most
advanced
technology
slum
neighborhoods.
group
would
in the total
the
that this
based,
managerial
develop
of national
and
date
of a nationally
by effective
the
initiative,
to convene
rehabilitation
group
non-profit
skills,
market
leaders
and
at
be invited
urban
maximum
service
private
for utilization
of the
rebuilding
of our
and
Draft. .. May
page 2
3,
As
1967
you
Cities
Program,
private
sector
The
gave
the
so only you
in this
great
pressure
Three
factors
$
the growth
decline
or it can
to keep
to space
technology
commit
human
need
not
and
with
by
the
the
of housing
the
need
families
replaced;
rapid
is expanding
rate
urbanization
need;
starts
are
or the price
can pay.
country
share
has
of our
two
options:
national
housing
with
the
currently
same
and
adequate
amount
Nor
can
our
television
technological
housing
of resources,
to rehouse
available
automobiles,
scientific
for decent
size
up the
breakthrough.
vehicles,
itself to apply
to involve
than it can be
accompanied
pace
builds
do more
technological
Model
is explosive.
faster
a low
half of our
to build
are
Resources
a national
and
divert a greater
resources
*
is decaying
costs
pressure
it can
leadership
the
to this:
in household
that perhaps
*
the
in America
in population
insufficient
this
provide
in creating
purpose.
housing
increasing
As
leadership
contribute
older
and
can
on housing
'
*
necessary
society
sets,
skills
in a healthy
America
advanced
apply
etc.
and
to satisfy
and
without
not
the basic
attractive
living
environment.
There
scale
institutional
is
real
evidence
innovation.
of a growing
readiness
to support
large
Draft... May
page 3
3,
Local
hand.
Existing
are
incentives
management
I am
capabilities
create
can
enclosing
available
to attract
under
the
necessary
institution.
the broad
it to your
Working
massive
leadership
of economy
of scale
outlines
of the functions
At your
convenience
can be provided.
I commend
your
of the value
an institution.
of such
up materials
emerging.
conference, acting
understanding
with proper
are
forms
institutional
This
investment.
back
1967
attention.
the
capital
is at
capital
and direction,
and
efficient
and
appropriate
A PROPOSAL FOR A NATIONALLY BASED, PRIVATE
NON-PROFIT URBAN SERVICES CORPORATION TO
REHABILITATE AND REBUILD SUBSTANDARD URBAN
SLUM NEIGHBORHOODS
pressure
The
Three
factors
*
to
contribute
be
the
growth
in
are
starts
it
*
advanced
etc.
and
commit
keep
pace
the
the
to
For
realistic
itself
not
with
the
options:
the
same
immediate
available
apply
our
of
national
of
amount
future
this
option.
vehicles,
to
two
housing,
breakthrough.
space
half
share
a greater
more
are
our
perhaps
has
country
do
the
with
pay.
can
it
that
price
build
technological
not
to
divert
can
resources
technology
insufficient
to
is
a national
of
up
resources.
Currently
rate
and
resources
or
*
low
can
builds
pressure
this
housing
a
or
need
families
As
need;
costs
increasing
is
size
household
in
decline
rapid
by
accompanied
population
and
the
expanding
the
it
than
faster
decaying
replaced;
can
urbanization
*
explosive.
is
this:
is
housing
older
*
America
in
housing
on
Nor
to
rehouse
can
our
automobiles,
scientific
and
without
America
society
apply
television
technological
sets,
skills
ae
to
satisfy
the
a healthy
and
The
and
technology
is
markets
The
the
to
induce
hand
alone
to
is
and
and
better.
to
But
attract
housing
build
present
effective
investment
capital
a
to
position
to
this
recognized
on
Urban
to
call
intend
citizens
private
of
adequate
rehabilitate
cannot
in
respond
Congress
"T
to
private
and
in
environment.
programs
Johnson
the
decent
and
houses
small
management,
large
enough
innovation.
initiative
to
for
faster,
of
President
President
Message
at
and
amounts
need
living
cheaper,
institutions
significant
human
attractive
communities
scale
and
basic
ae
the
leadership
challenge.
this
and
provide
when
Rural
together
from
he
said
in
his
1967
Poverty:
an
outstanding
country--
the
across
group
from business and labor, government and the
building industry--to examine every possible
means of establishing the institutions to
encourage the development of a large scale
efficient
rehabilitation
"T will ask
to find the
that exists
the
most
It
is
urged
leaders
at
the
The
that
White
President
House
should
a nationally
based,
to
bear
private
maximum
to
the
of
this group of outstanding Americans
best ways to tap the enormous market
in rebuilding our cities and to bring
modern
technology
industry.
systems
this
urgent
President
at
the
invite
non-profit
initiative
and
the
task."
convene
earliest
this
and
this
advanced
group
possible
group
service
most
to
of
date.
consider
corporation
resources,
national
the
the
which
most
organization
will
bring
advanced
oc
technology
and
managerial
skills
to
rehabilitate
and
rebuild
our
slum
neighborhoods.
A
Favorable
The
of
the
large
Climate
growing
cities
scale
communities.
of
Opinion
concern
is
of
creating
many
power
a climate
public-private
is
illustrated
1,
The
emergence
local,
regional
tions.
At
recently
will
of
which
more
private
and
$5 million
New
such
or
capital
than
90
for
and
support
rebuild
a
urban
of
non-profit
development
corporations
planned
for.
upwards
corporahave
These
of
$20
percent
has
been
example,
the
industry,
Workers,
racial
available
Jersey,
groups
million
subscribed
under
by
in
Scovil
Brass
Co.
and
munity
groups
urban
organizing
more
than
seed
capital.
and
the
leadership
of
toward
other
pledged
development
the
the
city
industrial,
to
raise
Gov.
Hughes,
organization
state-wide
Waterbury
a
with
in working
dollar
and
are
the
banks,
it
$500,000
have
leading
corporation
to
multimillion
an
the
leadership
development
appropriating
fund
problems
will
financed
urban
dozen
corporation,
to
solidly
organized
Automobile
metropolitan
similar
which
rehabilitate
state
a
Detroit,
religious
is
the
enterprise.
In
United
opinion
to
of
working
with
by
and
least
been
have
of
vehicle
This
groups
urban
a
development
administration,
labor
close
corporation
of
to
for
and
the
com-
$600,000
that
small
city.
eo
~ &
De
The
ment
corporation
Hole
Conference
of
widespread
Science
urban
and
Philadelphia
at
set
change
Corporation
The
of
forth
labor,
and
scientific
Its
working
staff.
and
Its
permit
it
to
Woods
House
Office
industrial
national
Working
Association
Dwellings
capital
appears
local
supports,
and
state
long
is
public-
of
to
available
national
to
be
tax
attract
institutional
overdue.
Purposes
board
finance,
community,
capital,
develop-
Association.
major
the
But
proposal
this
corporation's
business,
would
in
major
White
profit-based
potentially
are
incentives
investment.
capital
massive
The
financial
other
and
10
Chicago
Housing
guarantees,
federal
Existing
hand.
the
the
from
reorganization
the
emerging.
are
forms
and
among
and
as
such
groups
Institutional
HUD
urban
corporation.
private
the
emerged
a comparable,
reactivation
The
by
agreement
development
4.
a national
Technology.
form
to
in
which
sponsored
and
aggregates
interest
proposal
tentative
A
3.
«
would
the
and
foundations
contributed
recruit
building
the
by
national
of
consist
industry,
public
government
highest
level
leaders
the
academic
groups.
interest
and
private
managerial
and
funds,
technical
it
The
*
to
to
bring
American
industry.
identify
those
through
elements
and
systems
standardization
and
mass
and
costs
national
establish
produced
components.
analyze,
develop
in
investment
communities
areas.
and
other
capital
The
within
will
include
tax
guaranties,
which
yield
group
analyze
and
and
risk
of
metropolitan
of
"parlay"
ratios.
total
and
rural
Federal
residuals
long-term
attract
the
private
and
facilities
franchises,
have
will
mass
of
combinations
can
and
corporations
forms
comparatively
at
investment
continuously
and
incentives,
benefits
national
between
special
housing,
cities
This
new
attract
and
specifications
distribution
for
markets
common
would
corporation
development
local
affiliated
organize
into
performance
can--
which
markets--reduce
The
quality.
improve
of
hallmarks
the
are
that
cost
in
reduction
and
quality
in
increase
the
housing
capability
technical
and
managerial
the
organize
would
It
missions.
interrelated
have
would
corporation
ee
low
returns.
technical
the
skill
trade-offs
to
identify
entrepreneurial
and
can
be
local
and
regional
planning
and
participation
best
performed
local
residents,
tion
of
local
develop
long-term
industry
raise
continuity
income
economy
for
turn
Model
and
programs
of
this
revising
elimination
scale
can
obsolete
building
and
a major
information
the
general
public
in
and
center
the
contractors
programming
for
job
and
through
scheduling.
construction
develop
bidding
and
achieved
be
will
develop
and
best
coordinated
modernization
of
will
assistance
greater
providing
and
restrictive
the
special
through
productivity
and
Urban
and
unions
for
incentives
This
security.
programs.
activity
FHA-FNMA
to
activities.
Cities
operations
of
access
enhance
This
programs.
to
organiza-
the
specialized
and
expand
relevance
particular
have
in
Housing
of
of
municipalities.
training
and
which
development
competence,
service
Department
federal
of
usefulness
provide
supplement,
to
Development
In
the
with
cooperate
tasks
and
assist
would
managerial
and
supportive
and
capital
labor
corporations,
skills
technical
to
industries,
corporation
national
The
the
with
corporations
by
management
new
constituencies
housing
inspection
to
assist
realization
of
codes
and
procedures.
special
these
groups
goals.
continuously
scope
and
and
the
will
evaluate
objectives
local
permit
the
Two
questions
is
a
and
high
trained
for
personnel
The
group
recruit
personnel
for
resources
based
resources
Most
to
local,
provide
production
can
to
if
aggrandize
effective
tools
national
corporation
talent
local
simply
urban
appear
a
is
are
not
enough
development
to
prime
searce
be
organizing.
responsibility
technical
and
to
management
corporations.
local
on
not
of
for
will
research,
markets
able
greatest
programs
standardized
these
be
the
are
often
nationally
to
to
bring
local
not
be
A
benefit
these
potential.
big
development
components.
to
areas
access
with
will
areas
all,
investment
group
resources
incentives
of
A
there
they
train
and
bear
most
This
asked:
have
A national
investment
interacts.
technical
as
would
local
matched.
be
manage
and
corporations
reasons:
quickly
identify,
structure,
cities.
and
to
as
not
the
Currently,
corporations
Capital
of
it
corporation?
managerial
national
which
our
these
priced.
the
national
properly
national
First-rate
the
with
of
may
necessary
adjust
emergence
rebuilding
Why
of
groups
the
for
Ls
and
enough
and
national
of
all.
mass
group
ae
Why
Pe
local
Its
and
not
of
sale
greatest
the
and
need
A
communities.
to
services.
these
desires
the
importance
and
in
contract
better
problems
group
with
mortgage
receive
tax
would
with
be
for
in
Only
in
dealing
of
a better
and
needs
perceive
with
It
difficult
motivations
are
groups.
position
to
a non-profit
contributions.
the
organization.
community
grants
to
readily
would
questions
where
credit.
exempt
It
credentials
government
Federal
responsive
more
community
relationships
A non-profit
be
residents.
local
of
far
delicate
critical
the
of
and
have
would
entity
non-profit
would
profitable
immediately
most
the
or
easiest
the
development,
urban
for
potential
greatest
the
to
is
responsibility
to
and
corporations
development
local
service--service
is
entity
national
the
to
cities,
the
to
in
element
key
The
reasons:
these
for
is
group
non-profit
A
group?
a non-profit
necessary
effectively.
most
function
this
develop
can
corporation
service
national
A
obvious.
is
groups
development
local
among
communication
for
necessity
The
process
group
to
bulk
could
So.
local.
rightfully
The
It
and
involvement
slums,
own
momentum
neither
that
of
support
generalized
there
are
more
direct
financial
materials
and
a modernized
key
minimization
is
always
of
risks
Ls
The
a major
and
The
envisioned.
is
effective
more
become
and
change
resource
and
economy
through
for
the
new
profitable
state
Federal,
construction
and
and
industry.
and
management,
effective
scale,
include
components
for
markets
elimination
These
opportunities.
profit
more
in
inherent
municipal
support:
Investment
Long-Term
mortgage
active
enterprise.
benefits
of
the
without
effective
be
local
nor
corporation
national
investment,
for
The
private
the
areas
new
to
the
can
from
Aside
of
their
corporations
development
urban
create
capacity
institutions
Enterprise
obvious
is
of
Private
of
Role
set
the
are
circumstances.
changing
with
a new
have
will
institution
generating
Rather,
which
relationships
which
responsibilities
and
initiative
assume
would
which
entity
monolithic
a
of
creation
the
for
recommendation
a
not
is
This
instrument
long-term
will
investment.
continue
FHA-FNMA
to
serve
special
as
at:
play
to
These
loans
by
industrial
rates
in
exchange
kitchen
(prefabricated
by
the
land
by
retained
of
lease-backs
term
retail
outlets)
materials
and
units,
bathroom
and
agencies
housing
public
other
for
of
sale
the
franchises
board
wall
residual
and
investor-lessor.
land
the
and
institutions
municipalities,
where
organizations
depreciation
with
groups
non-profit
local
to
developments
of
lease-backs
values
interest
low
at
etc.).
systems,
or
for
available
been
hitherto
include:
aggregates
stations,
(gas
services
not
have
might
areas.
deprived
*
which
combination
in
resources
capital
other
attract
to
magnets
as
serve
can
counterparts
local
its
and
corporation
the
However
role.
a major
will
aids
renewal
urban
and
supplements
rent
funds,
assistance
oe
in
is
the
path
of
development.
of
development
Turnkey
structures
multi-purpose
and
communities.
These
employed
seek
in
to
the
in
and
areas.
"downtown"
develop
settings
rehabilitation
devices
investment
other
and
in
they
rebuilding
of
can
long
been
corporation
national
The
which
have
be
slum
equally
will
useful
neighborhoods.
long-
aces
Zs
Materials
As
the
previously
technical
based
and
upon
noted,
capacity
user
ComponentsSuppliers
to
corporation
together
in
common
can
bring
markets.
research
and
quality
building
components
can
also
systems
create
ou
This
by
by
local
massive
for
aero
and
space
Expansion
of
of
and
can
higher
suppliers.
materials
related
the
The
power
building
and
criteria,
corporations
expensive
transfer
have
eroups.
purchasing
traditional
defense,
Modernization
the
less
will
performance
development
of
opportunities
developed
by
local
development
corporation
national
developed
trigger
It
national
develop
standards
national
the
and
industries.
Construction
Industry
The
general
since
little
high
rate
flow
of
work
technology
of
A
can
basic
to
for
in
turn
minority
is
scale,
and
training
in
the
incentives
construction
and
based
industry
employment
workers.
use
a
continuous
of
modern
of
with
should
This
practices.
new
a
and
profitable
contractors.
with
increased
by
has
modernization
for
industry
methods
and
unstable
of
create
for
it
its
Characterized
Economy
provide
incentive
changed
failure.
locally
modernized
has
Century,
operations,
construction
expanded
an
opportunities
ranks
will
system
20th
the
of
investment
scheduling,
produce
the
business
capital
bidding,
flow
advent
the
discontinuous
and
small
contracting
continuous,
and
income
productivity
systemized
security
and
production
which
opening
of
is
union
other
corporation,
national
The
assist
*
negotiate
credit
Chicago
and
Philadelphia.
parallel
the
Model
additional
increment
will
be
rebuilding
of
in
*
York,
support
the
*
New
higher
an
institutional
studies
of
basis.
In
communities
other
prevent
might
and
development
of
sub-systems.
the
such
corporation
planning
program.
as
bring
overall
in
demonstrations
might
I1llustratively,
include
institutional
of
construction
a coordinated
national
undergird
constraints--legal,
local
situations,
expensive
development.
and
on
The
less
which
corporation
national
technological--which
multi-purpose
the
the
of
project
for
vehicle
exist
already
and
rapid
Cities
Model
analysis
systems
level
multi-faceted
and
the
of
the
review,
annual
program.
Cities
components
physical
the
goals
social
provide
one
and
mortgage
this
for
Precedents
and
FHA
by
to HUD
subject
be
course,
inspection.
and
audit
of
will,
require
bulk
of
Reservations
personnel.
HUD
other
for
provide
and
inspection
and
procedures
and
which currently
review
detailed
and
minute
would
It
processing
insurance
steps
many
of
certification
operations.
mortgage
bulk
for
HUD
mortgage
streamlining
in
*
closely
and
HUD
with
working
enhance
can
agencies,
Federal
Agencies
Federal
Other
and
HUD
with
Relationship
and
perhaps
skills
metropolitan
turnkey
Detroit,
metropolitan
its
entire
to
bear
systems
on
or
the
oad
The
with
the
Corporation
in
developing
also
OEFO,
Department,
Labor
agencies
will
be
able
work
closely
HEW
and
other
Federal
programs
for
labor
and
DOT,
training
to
management
activities.
Relationships
The
with
Cities
national
corporations
to
*
with
work
total
encourage
acquire
*
and
home
ownership
the
the
of
and
development
coordinate
the
necessary
facilities
formation
distribution
or
assist
locally
based
organizations
new
in
of
to
multi-family
the
projects
development
of
plans.
residents
related
indigenous
housing
the
rehabilitated
rehabilitation
Opportunities
tion
in
appropriate,
the
plan
local
revitalization.
limited
newly
where
of
assist
train
other
and
neighborhood
and,
involve
to
housing
of
Groups
will
municipalities
and
non-profit
Local
corporation
development
for
and
and
of
the
program,
to
the
groups
commercial
to
in
the
development
reconstruction
profit
related
neighborhood
planning
of
job
and
the
organiza-
service
and
manage
facilities.
_
This
TVA
was
age
to us
which
proposal
the
innovation
in
the
50's,
successfully
can
building
is
of
I urge
in
the
great
of
the
we
must
join
our
communities
this
proposal
1930's
public
in
be
now
this
given
14
-
American
tradition.
and
opened
NASA
create
and
the
new
private
8,
1967
as
the
space
institutions
efforts
in
the
re-
decade.
the
most
earnest
Walter
May
up
Just
consideration.
P.
Reuther
Dutec-Office Communication
May
To
Mr.
5,
1967
Reuther
Lillian
From
Sub ject
Dr. Clark Kerr of University
following message:
There
is a proposal
faculty members
on the Vietnam
it careful
of California
being
prepared
at Berkeley
situation.
consideration,''
called with the
by a group
on a national
He hopes
of
conference
you will give
——
1
SL
—
ETON AN
IRN TANT IE
BCP CSE
TD ADSI
BBN Ted Wl
&
2a EE
ONAN
E
SSE GRIN RONNIE
LI PL LEE SEITE OLE
cer
pinSPOR oe ie
% raya
eh
AOS SORELY
gue sen
LIT
DOLE STE TENET
NIE
INSETS
TE
BHM
Yair,
A PROPOSAL FOR A NATIONALLY BASED, PRIVATE
NON-PROFIT URBAN SERVICES CORPORATION TO
REHABILITATE AND REBUILD SUBSTANDARD URBAN
SLUM NEIGHBORHOODS
The
pressure
on
factors
Three
housing
in
America
housing
older
*
housing
rate
of
to
starts
are
insufficient
with
the
need. or
keep
pace
that
perhaps
price...
the
can
families
our
half
need;
the
low
a
in
decline
and
and
costs
increasing
*
accompanied
expanding
is
size
household
faster
population
urbanization
rapid
by
decaying
replaced;
in
growth
the
*
is
be
can
it
than
explosive.
this:
to
contribute
is
pay«
As
this
pressure
up,
the
it
can
divert
*
*
it
of
resources,
the
is
this
option
can
a major
Our
space
vehicles,
scientific
decent
and
and
society
can
automobiles,
technological
adequate
housing
continue
not
technological
to
apply
through
breakthrough.
advanced
technology
etc.,
and
fail to
to
satisfy
the
basic
human
healthy
and
skills
a
effective
future
This
option.
sets,
television
in
be
immediate
the
realistic
amount
same
the
with
For
only
build housing,
to
more
do
can
or
our
of
share
a greater
resources
national
options:
two
has
country
builds
attractive
living
to
apply
need
for
environment.
cheaper,
communities
and
to
markets
enough
large
and
capital
investment
private
of
amounts
programs
and
organizations
ing
significant
management,
effective
attract
cannot
build-
scale
small
our present
But
better.
and
faster,
houses
to build
and
rehabilitate
to
hand
at
technology
the
have
We
innova-
induce
tion.
from
citizens
he
when
to
Message
1967
his
in
said
Poverty:
Rural
the
across
labor,
and
business
country--from
private
of
group
outstanding
an
together
to call
intend
"T
and
Urban
on
Congress
the
this
recognized
Johnson
President
challenge.
this
to
respond
to
initiative
the
is
alone
President
The
and
leadership
the
provide
to
position
a
in
~
pos
y
er
ev
e
in
am
ex
to
-ry
st
du
in
ng
di
il
bu
the
government and
e
ag
ur
co
en
to
ns
io
ut
it
st
in
the
ng
hi
is
bl
ta
es
of
sible means
on
ti
ta
li
bi
ha
re
t
en
ci
fi
ef
e
al
sc
e
rg
la
a
of
t
en
the developm
industry.
"Tl will
ways
best
ask
to
of
group
this
tap
enormous
the
President
the
at
the
At
of
tion
bear
and
A
a national,
managerial
The
combined
is
of
Climate
Favorable
cities
skills,
growing
creating
public
communities.
and
to
this
urban
service
and
find
the
and
the
rebuild-
leaders
national
which
with
and
rebuild
power
groups
the
our
most
slum
organiza-~
the
consider
to
group
corporation
resources,
rehabilitate
of
date.
invite
initiative
in
group
this
convene
should
non-profit,
private
maximum
he
time,
same
to
the most modern systems
this urgent task."
possible
earliest
the
at
House
White
that
urged
is
exists
that
market
the
ing our cities and to bring
most advanced technology to
It
Americans
outstanding
bring
will
advanced
technology
neighborhoods.
Opinion
concern
a climate
private
of
of
many
opinion
institution
which
to
will
with
the
support
rehabilitate
and
problems
a4 large
rebuild
to
of
scale,
urban
the
This
is
illustrated
The
Li
and
regional
dozen
groups
which
by
state
will
have
than
more
organized
or
projected.
upwards
of
$20
of
capital
working
90
been
have
corporations
such
has
For
example,
a
These
of
million,
private
by
subscribed
been
percent
least
At
corporations.
development
urban
local,
non-profit
financed
solidly
of
emergence
enterprise.
*
$5
available
million
seed
capital.
New
In
Hughes,
ing
$500,000
the
Waterbury,
and
Company
community
to
of
a
state-wide
dollar
corporation.
the
to
pledged
have
$500,000
to
fund
an
for
that
small
Brass
Scovil
labor
industrial,
groups
corporation
appropriat-
is
organization
Connecticut,
other
of
leadership
the
legislature
toward
development
urban
ment
the
multimillion
similar
close
under
Jersey,
Gov.
In
and
working
in
it
to
than
more
with
corporation
development
racial
and
a metropolitan
organizing
are
leadership
Workers,
Automobile
religious
banks,
leading
the
United
the
industry,
automobile
the
Detroit
in
and
raise
urban
develop-
city.
a
The
ya
Conference
and
Technology.
form
The
4.
and
New
at
The
and
Corporation
The
Its
finance,
foundations,
community,
contributed
by
level
The
change
government
managerial
corporation
*
massive
attract
long
is
proposal
this
in
forth
set
The
investment.
capital
the
and
public
funds,
overdue.
would
interrelated
ageregate,
on
managerial
and
bring
and
marks
it
permit
would
scientific
and
capital,
working
Its
of
to
recruit
It
would
staff.
technical
have
academic
the
groups.
interest
private
and
and
industry,
building
ieaders
national
of
consist
would
board
to
of
a national
technical
housing
reduction
missions.
in
American
the
cost
the
scale,
capability
increase
that
industry.
are
in
to
quality
the
hall-
be
other
Purposes
corporation's
labor,
business,
highest
are
institutional
national
to
available
and
tax
supports,
local
and
state
to
appears
capital
Working
emerging.
guarantees,
Federal
incentives
financial
are
forms
institutional
Association
Association.
Housing
Philadelphia
Existing
hand.
major
the
admixed
the
Dwellings
Chicago
the
as
such
groups
private
and
public
of
reorganization
and
reactivation
corporation.
development
urban
national
profit-based,
a
groups
industrial
major
10
among
agreement
A tentative
3,
to
Science
of
Office
President's
the
and
by HUD
sponsored
Hole
Woods
the
from
emerged
which
proposal
develop-
urban
a national
in
interest
widespread
corporation
ment
a
the
through
which
standardization
and
costs
and
reduce
can
markets
mass
establish
national
fications
and
produced
mass
of
within
cities
areas.
This
of
at
investment
The
skill
the
to
tasks
between
can
best
be
and
regional
development
the
planning
and
residents,
the
and
and
yield
and
technical
"parlay"
performed
by
corporations
labor
ratios.
risk
management
participation
industries,
returns.
low
analyze
entrepreneurial
which
capital
have
will
benefits
other
and
continuously
trade-offs
identify
incentives,
tax
comparatively
group
national
rural
combinations
include
long-term
attract
and
metropolitan
residuals
franchises,
can
will
communities
total
guaranties,
Federal
which
and
housing,
in
and
forms
new
attract
and
facilities
special
of
distribution
investment
private
common
into
components.
develop
analyze,
local
affiliated
organize
low-cost
for
markets
speci-
performance
corporations
development
would
corporation
The
quality.
improve
systems
and
elements
those
identify
of
and
local
with
local
municipalities.
ee
assist
ment
in
the
organization
corporations,
technical
skills
access
capital
and
to
training
provide
and
and
and
Urban
Development
and
enhance
to
the
scale
In
new
of
a major
special
groups
scope,
acts.
income
and
through
achieved
construction
will
modernization
this
for
revising
and
housing
codes
bidding
and
inspec-
and
and
and
and
This
of
the
evaluate
objectives
the
permit
assist
in
goals.
and
adjust
the
of
local groups
will
public
general
these
to
center
information
realization
continuously
tion
job
opera-
of
procedures.
develop
the
productivity
coordinated
obsolete
and
unions
for
be
constituencies
elimination
pro-
particular
continuity
best
expand
program.
industry
turn
building
Housing
Federal
have
greater
and
restrictive
tion
of
Cities
for
can
This
scheduling.
develop
service
of
incentives
providing
of
competence,
supplement,
will
Model
programming
security.
to
raise
to
and
economy
Department
usefulness
long-term
through
specialized
supportive
activity
contractors
tions
the
the
This
develop
develop-
programs.
with
relevance
local
managerial
cooperate
grams.
of
the
the
national
structure,
corpora-
which
it
inter-
emergence
of
the
with
io
cities...
eur
questions
1.
is
may
properly
Why
necessary
*
be
asked:
corporation
national
A
corporation?
a national
for
of
rebuilding
the
for
tools
effective
most
Two
ee
reasons:
these
are
manage
local
as
and
train
technical
local
corporations.
often
are
to
access
sources
to
bear
Most
big
to
enough
development,
ized
these
aggregate
The
necessity
development
service
most
mass
production
of
to
markets
for
groups
corporation
effectively.
group
national
the
communication
is
obvious.
can
develop
not
will
for
A
re-
potential.
local
incentives
components.
with
resources
provide
and
areas
group
these
bring
programs
all,
not
if
local,
for
personnel
investment
greatest
of
areas
on
to
able
be
will
and
A national
based
nationally
prime
investment
local
matched.
not
organizing.
recruit
management
and
resources
a
have
identify,
to
responsibility
Capital
would
group
national
The
be
to
appear
they
as
quickly
corporations
development
urban
to
people
trained
enough
not
simply
there
Currently
priced.
high
and
scarce
is
talent
technical
and
managerial
First-rate
be
research,
standardcan
benefit
of
among
local
A
all.
national.
this
function
Why
hs
for
these
a
necessary
is
group
non-profit
A
group?
non-profit
reasons:
communities.
Its
greatest
need
the
of
position
and
grants
contract
to
to
process
in
be
would
group
A non-profit
*
critical.
are
motivations
the
questions
where
areas
delicate
and
difficult
It
in
credentials
better
far
have
would
work
organization.
community
local
with
readily
more
could
It
residents.
respon-
the
of
desires
and
needs
the
to
sive
more
be
would
entity
non-profit
A
Wo:
services.
these
of
sale
profitable
to
not
and
immediately
most
the
or
easiest
the
poten-
greatest
the
and
to
is
responsibility
development,
urban
for
tial
local
to
and
corporations,
development
local
to
cities,
the
to
service--service
is
entity
national
the
in
element
key
The
*
a better
government
with
Federal
bulk
for
mortgage
credit.
a
Only
*
exempt
This
which
Rather,
their
change
would
assume
a new
own
and
is
set
a recommendation
not
initiative
of
and
generating
momentum
is
envisioned.
become
more
effective
group
non-profit
for
the
institutions
with
tax
contributions.
creation
responsibilities
The
receive
could
and
institution
changing
which
of
a monolithic
entity
rightfully
local.
are
relationships
will
have
circumstances.
which
the
create
capacity
to
The
Role
of
Private Enterprise
corporations
development
support
there
financial
for
minimization
of
through
risks
Long-Term
Li
The
major
supplements
rent
the
for
resource
corporation
other
areas.
capital
These
urban
and
management,
and
a
support:
counterparts
resources
which
have
However,
role.
attract
to
deprived
to
available
been
funds,
assistance
magnets
as
serve
can
hitherto
not
a major
play
will
aids
renewal
special
a
as
Serve
to
continue
FHA-FNMA
investment.
local
might
and
municipal
will
instrument
its
and
materials,
Investment
mortgage
long-term
and
industry.
and
state
Federal,
include
effective
scale,
of
areas
new
These
components
construction
economy
always
is
key
The
for
markets
profitable
more
and
modernized
more
new
investment,
opportunities.
profit
direct
more
are
of
elimination
the
in
inherent
benefits
generalized
the
from
Aside
slums,
enterprise.
private
of
and
involvement
active
the
without
effective
be
can
urban
local
nor
corporation
national
the
neither
that
obvious
is
It
include:
*
loans
by
industrial
rates
in
exchange
sale
of
outlets,
kitchen
systems,
*
and
with
by
groups
units,
the
for
retail
(prefabricated
materials
bathroom
of
developments
or
depreciation
the
stations,
interest
wall
board
etc.).
lease-backs
profit
and
low
at
franchises
for
(gas
services
etc.)
groups
housing
public
and
to
residual
investor-lessor.
local
non-
agencies
values
retained
where
organizations
long-term
of
path
the
in
is
land
municipalities,
by
other
and
institutions
the
land
of
lease-backs
*
development.
structures
in
which
of
slum
The
areas.
"downtown"
they
can
Materials and Components Suppliers
As
can
by
also
space
aero
defense,
criteria,
based
upon
The
research
and
and
The
since
discontinuous
advent
the
of
the
it
operations,
is
developed
industries.
related
general
Lt
suppliers.
systems
and
expensive
less
of
building
materials
of
transfer
for
This
markets.
development
traditional
by
components
can
corporation
national
common
trigger
of
the
Construction Industry
system
has
changed
Modernization and Expansion
3.
little
performance
in
opportunities
create
have
together
building
quality
higher
will
corporations
can
power
purchasing
massive
corporation
groups.
local
the
by
development
local
national
develop
to
national
the
noted,
previously
developed
standards
bring
and
capacity
technical
user
rebuilding
and
neighborhoods.
2.
the
settings
develop
rehabilitation
the
in
useful
equally
be
to
seek
in
employed
been
long
will
corporation
national
communities.
have
devices
investment
other
and
These
and
multi-purpose
of
development
Turnkey
*
contracting
20th
and
unstable
has
a high
small
by
Characterized
Century.
rate
methods
its
of
and
business
Fai lure.
Economy
and
training
modernization
produce
for
an
locally
in
the
of
bidding,
expanded
based
use
of
of
scale,
modern
work
scheduling,
construction
contractors,
continuous
a
technology
and
industry
flow
will
of
capital
create
incentives
construction
practices.
and
profitable
with
new
investment,
This
for
should
opportunities
A
flow
can
modernized
in
incentive
for
turn
industry
provide
increased
with
continuous,
employment
and
productivity
systematized
income
and
security
opening
of
production
which
union
is
the
ranks
to
basic
minority
workers.
Relationship
The
Federal
with
HUD
national
agencies,
can
*
and
Other
Federal
corporation,
enhance
HUD
working
assist
in
which
certification
currently
other
processing
of
will,
annual
review,
for
Precedents
Chicago,
and
support
additional
and
less
which
provide
Cities
an
of
local
exist
in
New
the
Model
Cities
program.
will
be
the
rapid
rebuilding
of
the
physical
the
sociai
goals
demon-
vehicle
for
level
systems
analysis
national
of
program.
institutional
development.
the
mortgage
inspection.
undergird
in higher
strations'
of
HUD
other
subjectto HUD
and
increment
expensive
components
detailed
Philadeiphia.
parallel
The
Modei
and
bulk
already
this
steps
and
and
of
be
course,
audit,
many
FHA
Reservations
credit
York,
of
by
and
insurance
minute
require
inspection
and
personnel,
and
and
mortgage
mortgage
bulk
for
for
review
*
HUD
would
streamlining
negotiate
the
It
with
procedures,
provide
*
closely
operations.
and
*
Agencies
lLIllustratively,
corporation
constraints--legal,
migh
one
project
include
studies
institutional,
and
coordinated
on
a
In
other
The
OEO,
Department,
programs
corporation
for
Relationships
The
HEW,
DOT,
labor
with
and
and
and
Federal
other
work
closely
agencies
in
to
able
be
also
the
with
Labor
training
developing
activities.
management
Cities
national
will
sub-systems.
or
systems
metropolitan
overall
of
development
and
planning
the
on
bear
to
skills
its
bring
might
corporation
national
the
metropolitan
as
such
basis.
turnkey
perhaps
and
situations,
Detroit,
communities
multi-purpose
entire
of
tion
construc-
prevent .the
technological--which
Local Groups
corporations
development
local
train
will
corporation
to
*
with
work
to
plan
development
of
housing
the
ordinate
locally
bution
*
where
ment
of
involve
home
the
or
assist
appropriate,
ownership
of
planning
the
development
reconstruction
the
of
newly
projects
in
the
the
and
develop-
neighborhood
rehabilitation
job
re-
plans.
of
residents
the
to
multi-family
new
of
distri-
limited
acquire
to
organizations
and,
total
formation
and
non-profit
based
habilitated
the
in
assist
and
encourage
and
revitalization.
neighborhood
*
for
necessary
facilities
other
co-
and
municipalities
program,
opportunities
the
in
organization
related
of
~
1 oo
indigenous
profit
manage
housing
the
groups
to
and
related
service
and
commercial
facilities.
This
was
in
the
the
proposal
innovation
50's,
join
public
this
decade,
we
and
I urge
of
must
the
now
private
this
is
in
the
1930's
create
and
the
efforts
proposal
great
in
be
American
NASA
new
the
given
opened
tradition,
up
institutions
rebuilding
the
most
of
8,
1967
our
P.
as
TVA
age
to
us.
space
which
earnest
Walter
May
the
Just
can successfully
communities
in
consideration,
Reuther
Intec-Ofgice Communication
1967
May 19,
Reuther
To
Mr.
From
Jillian
Subject
Mrs. Hortense
consideration:
phoned
Gable
in the following
names
for your
Research
President, Defense
Ben Alexander,
Corporation, Santa Barbara
Philadelphia
R. Stewart Rauch, President,
Savings Fund Society
Earl Schwulst, Chairman Emeritus,)
)
Morris Crawford, President
Bowery Savings Bank
Gordon
Kermit
Janss
President,
Pomalmeri,
Vic
California
Company,
President)
Allan Tishman,
Research
Jos. H. Newman,
Tishman
Edw,
Construction
and
Rice,
Co,,
New
Director)
York
President
Linn & Co,, uos Angeles
(Mr. Rice is the man who has developed
48 hour rehabilitation program in New
Is the top man in the country
York City.
on pre-stressed concrete, )
T.Y.
John
T.
R.
Hazeltine,
Thomas
Studies,
W.
Manager,
Systems
Co.,
Civil
Systems
Los Angeles
Center
O. Paine, Manager,
G.E. Santa Barbara
for
Advance
Mr.
Reuther
-2-
May
19,
1967
A man by the last name of Phillippe (she
couldn't remember his first name) who is
G. E.'s Chairman of the Board
She
said that Alexander,
greatly to the program.
Newman,
Hazeltine
and
Paine
She can be reached in New York City at (212) 535-7743
or at her home:
210 E. 68th Street, New York 10021,
oepiu42
would
add
MAY
1 1967
Intec-Ofgice Communication
April 28, 1967
To
The
From
steve
Subject
The
Officers
Schlossberg
Carpenters'
- Legal
Department
and Asbestos
Workers!
Cases.
s.
case
r
labo
ant
ort
imp
two
n
dow
ded
han
rt
Cou
e
rem
Sup
the
,
1967
17,
On April
es
cas
e
thes
that
ded
clu
con
I
,
re
ssu
pre
e
som
er
und
s,
case
e
On reading of thes
and
ons
uni
al
stri
indu
for
s
ion
cat
ifi
ram
ve
ati
irm
aff
than
ve
ati
neg
e
mor
h
had muc
with
es
cas
e
thes
s
cus
dis
I
y,
stud
e
som
r
afte
Now
ral.
the community in gene
with
cy
poli
UAW
a
out
k
wor
ht
mig
we
that
ing
hop
o,
mem
this
in
the Officers
.
ysis
anal
an
lly
era
gen
e
mor
e
ulat
circ
I
ore
bef
es
cas
e
thes
respect to
ts
men
com
k
fran
the
and
es
cas
e
thes
by
sed
rai
ues
iss
e
itiv
sens
Because of the
rs
ice
Off
the
to
only
sent
n
bee
have
o
mem
this
of
es
copi
I think required,
and
to Irv
Bluestone.
the
of
e
sid
the
on
n
rla
(Ha
on
isi
dec
it
spl
4
to
5
l
sua
unu
The Court, in an
ns
tio
sec
key
two
d
ue
tr
ns
co
e)
sid
er
oth
the
on
s
la
Unions and Black and Doug
t
tha
d
hel
and
Act
y
tle
Har
t
Taf
the
of
go)
car
hot
and
t
cot
(secondary boy
t,
en
em
re
ag
an
of
t
en
em
rc
fo
en
the
nor
t,
en
em
re
ag
an
neither the making of
d
te
ca
ri
ab
ef
pr
of
eat
thr
the
t
ins
aga
n
me
es
ad
tr
aimed at protecting the work of
building materials was unlawful.
The
Carpenters'
Case
At issue in this case was the following clause:
t
ne
bi
ca
h
ic
wh
on
b
jo
y
an
on
rk
wo
l
al
sh
"No employee
work;
fixtures,
mill
work,
sash
doors,
trim
or other
de
ma
nio
Un
is
me
sa
e
th
ss
le
un
ed
us
is
rk
detailed millwo
of
d
oo
rh
he
ot
Br
ed
it
Un
e
th
of
l
be
La
n
io
and bears the Un
is
th
of
er
mb
me
No
a.
ic
er
Am
of
s
er
in
Jo
d
Carpenters an
ll
mi
a
om
fr
ng
mi
co
al
ri
te
ma
le
nd
ha
District Council will
s,
ck
lo
s,
tt
bu
r
fo
ne
do
en
be
s
ha
g
in
tt
fi
d
an
t
where cutting ou
y
an
r
no
n,
io
pt
ri
sc
de
y
an
of
re
wa
rd
ha
or
,
es
at
letter pl
g
in
be
to
r
io
pr
ed
tt
fi
en
be
ve
ha
h
ic
wh
doors or transoms
e
ur
ct
pi
,
il
ra
r,
ai
ch
,
se
ba
g
in
ud
cl
in
b,
jo
on
furnished
n
io
ct
se
is
Th
.
ed
tt
fi
ly
us
io
ev
pr
en
be
s
molding, which ha
.
.
ns
io
ct
se
in
d
he
is
rn
fu
rk
wo
n
io
it
rt
pa
pt
to exem
The
Officers
There
was
April
no argument
on the first sentence.
28,
Everyone
1967
agreed that
it was a hot cargo clause and violated Section 8 (e) of the Act.
The
question was to the legality of the part of clause permitting union
members to refuse to handle prefabricated doors.
When the contractor,
whose specifications did not require pre-fitted doors, prepared to install
fully
machined
labor practice
of the doors.
The
was
doors,
charges
the
union
were
struck
brought
to
enforce
the
clause.
against the Union by the manufacturer
NLRB dismissed the charges against the Union.
It held that the clause
designed to protect traditional work done by carpenters at construction
sites and not to cause the employer to ''cease doing business''
meaning
the
Unfair
of the clause.
not the
contractor,
It is noteworthy
that
It found further that the strike was
manufacturer),
in three
other
not
cases,
secondary
where
the
and,
job
within the
(against
primary
lawful.
therefore,
specifications
for prefabricated doors, the charges against the union were upheld
in the Supreme Court, the unions did not contest those findings.
called
and,
The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, while agreeing that the strike was
primary and, therefore, not unlawful under §8 (b)(4), reversed the Board
The Supreme
and found the clause itself to be an unlawful hot cargo clause.
Court disagreed and upheld the Board on both issues.
The opinion of the Court by Justice Brennan, goes way back in history to
conclude that Congress intended only to bar as secondary, activity in
fact carried on against an employer for its effect somewhere else. Moreover,
it is plain that the Court was sensitive to the job-decimating effect of technology.
The
Brennan
opinion
states:
"In addition to all else, ''the silence of the sponsors of (the)
Amendments is pregnant with significance. . .'' Labor Board
v.
Fruit
& Vegetable
Packers,
supra,
at 66.
Before
we
may
say that Congress meant to strike from workers! hands the
economic weapons traditionally used against their employers'
efforts to abolish their jobs, that meaning should plainly
'‘'(I)nthis area of automation and onrushing techappear.
nologocial change, no problems in the domestic economy
are of greater concern than those involving job security
Because of the potentially
and employment stability.
cruel impact upon the lives and fortunes of the working
men and women of the Nation, these problems have
oc
The
Officers
of responsible
government,
private
particularly of organized labor.'
Products
Corp.
v.
attention of
engaged the solicitous
have understandably
Labor
196%
28,
April
business,
and
Fibreboard Paper
Board,
379
5S.
U.
205,
e260
ect
exp
ld
wou
We
J.).
t,
war
Ste
of
n
nio
opi
g
in
rr
cu
on
(c
that legislation curtailing the ability of management
se
the
to
ons
uti
sol
for
ate
oti
neg
to
ly
ari
unt
vol
or
lab
and
by
ed
ed
ec
pr
be
ld
wou
ms
le
ob
pr
ult
fic
dif
and
nt
ica
signif
n
io
at
er
id
ns
co
and
,
ate
deb
and
dy
stu
l
na
io
ss
re
ng
co
ive
extens
of voluminous
economic,
and
scientific,
_
statistical
The silence regarding such matters in the
data.
,
ss
re
ng
Co
t
tha
ce
den
evi
elf
its
is
ss
re
ng
Co
xth
-si
Eighty
in enacting Sec.
8 (e), had no thought of prohibiting
directed
agreements
preservation.
to work
In fact,
ee
tt
mi
om
bc
Su
the
h
bot
(e),
8
.
Sec
of
t
en
tm
ac
en
the
since
e
te
it
mm
Co
ate
Sen
the
of
er
ow
np
Ma
and
on Employment
and the Subcommittee
of Automation and the
on Labor and Public Welfare,
Unemployment and the Impact
Select Subcommittee on
Committee on Education
extensively studying the
by increased technology
legislation
We
Labor of the House
and Labor have been
threats to workers posed
and automation, and some
directed to the problem
has
cannot lightly impute to Congress
8 (e) to preclude labor-management
these
on
been passed.
an intent in Sec.
agreements to ease
st
mo
s
thi
on
ng
ni
ai
rg
ba
e
tiv
lec
col
effects through
"
y.
log
hno
tec
ed
nc
va
ad
by
d
ate
cre
m
le
vital prob
l
ca
Lo
e
er
wh
se
ca
y
le
ad
Br
n
le
Al
e
th
th
wi
n
io
at
tu
si
is
th
s
st
ra
nt
co
t
ur
The Co
or
n
io
un
r
he
ot
y
an
by
de
ma
al
ri
te
ma
IBEW, said "we will not permit any
y
an
to
in
t
pu
be
d
an
ty
Ci
rk
Yo
w
Ne
to
in
me
co
to
s
er
rk
wo
n
io
un
nno
y
an
by
building in New York City.''
r
fo
ss
ne
si
bu
ab
gr
to
s
wa
e
er
th
ct
The obje
s
wa
ce
vi
s
y'
le
ad
Br
n
le
Al
s.
ee
oy
pl
em
r
ei
th
d
an
s
er
ur
ct
fa
nu
ma
rk
Yo
New
ng
ni
ai
rg
ba
e
th
in
an
th
er
th
ra
e,
er
wh
se
el
ns
io
it
nd
co
ct
fe
ef
to
d
me
ai
it
at
th
unit.
The
Brennan
opinion contains
also this language:
of
ce
en
nt
se
’
le
nd
ha
t
no
l
il
'w
"The determination whether the
c.
Se
d
an
)
fe
8
c.
Se
ed
at
ol
vi
t
Rule 17 and its enforcemen
r
de
yn
r,
he
et
wh
y/
ir
qu
in
an
t
ou
th
8 (b)(4(B) cannot be made wi
e
iv
ct
je
ob
s
n'
io
Un
e
th
s,
ce
an
st
all the surrounding circum
or
s,
ee
oy
pl
em
's
ge
ou
Fr
r
fo
rk
was preservation of wo
-
3
-
3,
The
Officers
April
whether
the
tactically
agreements
and
boycott
calculated to satisfy union
28,
1967
were
objectives
elsewhere.
Were the latter the case, Frouge, the boycotting
employer, would be a neutral bystander, and the
agreement or boycott would, within the intent of
Congress become secondary.
There need not
be an actual dispute with the boycotted employer,
here the door manufacturer, for the activity to
fall within this category, so long as the tactical
object of the agreement and its maintenance is that
employer, or benefits to other than the boycotting
employees or other employees of the primary
employer
e
thus
making
or
agreement
the
boycott
The touchstone is whether
secondary in its aim.
the agreement or its maintenance is addressed to
the labor relations of the contracting employer
vis-a-vis
his own
This
employees.
will not
But (h)owever
always be a simple test to apply.
difficult the task of drawing lines more nice than
obvious, the statute compels the task. '' Local 761,
Electrical
Workers
674 (emphasis
v.
Board,
Labor
supplied).
366
U.
8.667,
Justice Brennan notes that the conduct of the union "related solely to the
preservation of the traditional tasks of the job-site carpenters. "'
Justice
Harlan's
separate
memorandum
opinion is a masterpiece
of brevity
and contains a much more incisive, less verbose statement of the Court's
ed
rlin
unde
have
(I
ows:
foll
as
s
read
full,
in
m,
ndu
ora
mem
The
e.
onal
rati
what
seems
to me the most important points).
'In joining the Court's opinion, I am constrained to add
these few words by way of underscoring the salient factors
which, in my judgment, make for the decision that has
been
reached
in these
difficult
cases.
1. The facts as found by the Board and the Court of
Appeals show that the contractual restrictive-product
rule in question, and the boycott in support of its enforcement, had as their sole objective the protection of union
members from a diminution of work flowing from changes
Union members traditionally had performed
in technology.
the task of fitting doors on the jobsite, and
-
4
-
The
Officers
April
28,
1967
there is no evidence of any motive for this contract provision
and its companion boycott other than the preservation of that work.
This, then, is not a case of a union seeking to restrict by contract
or boycott an employer with respect to the products he uses, for
the purpose of acquiring for its members work that had not
previously been theirs.
2.
The
only
question
thus
to be
decided,
and
which
is decided,
is
whether Congress meant, in enacting Secs. 8 (b)(4)(ii)(B) and 8 (e) of
the National Labor Relations Act, to prevent this kind of labormanagement arrangement designed to fend against possible adverse
effects upon workers arising from changing technology.
3.
Because of the possibly profound impacts that the answer to this
question may have upon labor-management relations and upon other
aspects of the economy, both sides of today's division in the Court
agree that we must be especially careful to eschew a resolution
of the issue according to our own economic ideas and to find one
It is further agreed that in pursuing
in what Congress has done.
the search for the true intent of Congress we should not stop with
the language of the statute itself, but must look beneath its surface
to the legislative history.
4, It is recognized by court and counsel on both sides that the
legislative history of Sec. 8 (b)(4)(ii)(B), with which Sec. 8 (e),
it is agreed, is to be
tangential references
taken pari passu, contains only the most
to problems connected with changing
Also, a circumspect reading of the legislative
technology.
record evincing Congress! belief that the statutory provisions
in question prohibited agreements and conduct of the kind involved
in Allen Bradley Co. v. Local Union No. 3, 325
not support a confident assertion that Congress
U. S. TOL; Wil
also had in mind
And
the sort of union-management activity before us here.
although it is arguable that Congress, in the temper of the times,
would have readily accepted a proposal to outlaw working preservation agreements
and boycotts,
even,
sense, such a surmise can hardly
tion of an existing statute.
5.
We
point
as here,
serve
in their
as a basis
are thus left with a legislative history which,
at issue,
conclusiveness
is essentially
negative,
only that Congress
5 -
was
which
shows
not squarely
most
limited
for the construc-
on the precise
with feir
faced with the
The
Officers
April
problem
this case
commitment
management
presents.
In view
28,
of Congress'
1967
deep
to the resolution of matters of vital importance to
and labor through the collective bargaining process,
and its recognition of the boycott as a_legitimate
weapon in that
process, it would be unfortunate were this Court to attribute
to Congress, on the basis of such an opaque legislative record,
a _ purpose to outlaw the kind of collective bargaining and
conduct involved in this case.
Especially at a time when
Congress is continuing to explordmethods for meeting the
economic problems increasingly arising in this technological
age
from
Scientific
advances,
this
Court
should
not
take
a stepuntil Congress has made unmistakably clear that
it wishes wholly to exclude collective bargaining as one
avenue
of approach
our economy.
to
solutions
in this
elusive
aspect
of
The dissenting opinion of Justice Stewart argues that the plain language of
the statute, reinforced by the legislative history, bars any clause and selfhelp to enforce any clause which contains any kind of language requiring that
one ''cease.
.
. or refrain from handling" the products of another manufacturer.
The
In the
Houston
Insulation
Asbestos
Contractors
Workers!
Assn.
case,
Case
Justice
Brennan
the opinion of the Court and the same four Justices dissented,
Stewart dissenting opinion in the Carpenters! case.
again
wrote
relying on the
One local of the Asbestos Workers! Union had a contract with
This case is easy.
Both the
an employer absolutely barring the contracting out of certain work.
NLRB and the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals held that a strike by that local to
The Supreme Court had no difficulty in agreeing too.
enforce the clause was lawful.
Another local of the Asbestos Workers! Union that also worked for the same
employer struck to enforce the subcontracting clause of the first local. Although
the Board saw nothing wrong with this, the Court of Appeals did, the Supreme
Court reversed and agreed with the Board that there was no secondary boycott.
It should
contend.
be noted that neither local union had a no-strike clause with which to
members
The only real issue was whether the second local, whose
were unaffected by the subcontracting, could strike the employer because
that same employer was violating his contract with the first local.
The
Court
a primary
correctly
employer,
reasoned that a strike called to affect the labor policies of
only,
was
protected
and
not
secondary,
and
because the strikers are not directly affected, become secondary.
There
here is that no neutral or stranger employer was involved.
with only one employer over his labor policies.
BON eats
does
not,
The point
was a dispute
The
Officers
;
April
Comments
on the
28,
1967
Decisions
No liberal(and certainly no trade unionist) can argue with the philosophy and the
Everyone agrees that Congress has not, happily,
rationale of the Brennan opinion.
legislated to deny unions the right through collective bargaining to ''ease"' the
effects of technology
and automation.
labor and management_must
Of course,
have the right ''voluntarily to negotiate for solutions to these significant and
difficult problems. "'
That
is not without problems.
if carried to extremes could
The ''solution'' in the Carpenters! case, however,
"solution'', a total ban on prefabricated products,
mean that plumbers, for instance, could with complete impunity refuse to
install air conditioning equipment or plumbing prefabrications made by
Similarly, the IBEW
our members or those of other industrial unions.
might insist that electricians make almost everything electrical at the jobIndeed, we are presently involved in a Labor Board case in Cleveland,
site.
where the Plumbers Union is insisting to the mechanical contractors there
that air conditioners made by Worthington Pump come to the job-site without coils,
Of course, our
conduits and pipings so that plumbers can build them on the job.
There is a similar argument
members at Worthington have been doing this work.
to
ect
resp
with
nds
dema
ng
maki
are
bers
plum
same
e
thos
e
wher
ress
in prog
Trane products - affecting the Machinists.
es
tic
Jus
the
,
jobs
save
and
try
to
ts
righ
n
unio
nal
itio
trad
ve
ser
pre
to
zeal
In their
did not, I believe, consider the jurisdictional dispute potential of this case.
I do think,
however,
after
some
reflections,
that the
emphasized
facts
of this
decision show the way to resist unreasonable demands for work belonging to
The decision carefully notes: that carpenters activity
industrial workers.
site
jobthe
of
s
task
nal
itio
trad
the
of
ion
vat
ser
pre
the
to
ly
was "related sole
and
s;
door
ed
fitt
and
t
-cu
pre
for
call
not
did
ns
tio
ica
cif
spe
the
that
carpenter;
y
usl
vio
pre
not
had
that
''
k
wor
ht
soug
n
unio
the
re
whe
case
a
not
is
this
that
been theirs. "'
The
case,
Court would,
resist
I think,
a trades
on the basis of the many
effort to control
work
for
references
to the Allen Bradley
a set of employers
or to
capture
that
n
nio
opi
my
is
it
,
tly
uen
seq
Con
on.
uni
the
for
k
wor
new
of
great masses
nal
sig
a
as
on
isi
dec
this
use
eto
abl
be
not
l
wil
men
des
tra
ng
ldi
bui
reckless
rk
dwo
han
the
to
ion
nat
the
urn
ret
ht
mig
ch
whi
nt
me
ve
mo
e
for a new Luddit
not
do
I
try.
nly
tai
cer
will
y
the
ugh
tho
n
eve
y,
tur
cen
h
19t
ly
ear
days of the
at
h
atc
scr
m
fro
e
don
was
k
wor
n
tai
cer
ago
rs
yea
20
e
aus
bec
,
that
e
iev
bel
ed
uc
od
pr
ng
bei
m
fro
k
wor
t
tha
p
sto
to
e
abl
be
will
men
des
the job-site, tra
The
Officers
April
in a factory and recapture it for its members.
done" obviously does not extend that far.
This
28,
1967
The phrase ''traditionally
decision must be construed
as permitting only those restrictions on factory made products which would
take away work previously having been done by the job-site people in the
immediate
past.
Moreover,
in a knock-down,
drag-out
jurisdictional
fight,
the
UAW
has
a powerful
social argument to make to the Court.
We have lived and we have collectively
bargainined socially responsible solutions to the automation challenge.
I need
not labor the point, but it seems to me that transfer clauses, SUB,
early
retirement, training and all the rest, while not perfect, combine to provide
a better answer to the nagging problem of meeting human needs and softening
the impact of advancing technology than a flat ''NO''.
Of course, unlike some
others, we don't believe that progress can or should be stopped.
A larger problem looms,
unions but which might, it
No matter
have the poor.
analysis it seems that, to
truly alleviate poverty:
which may not directly affect industrial
however,
We
seems to me, challenge the whole community.
how many poverty programs we run, in the final
date, we have found only three ways to cure or
(1)
redistribute the wealth; (2) increase the gross
national product and thereby get more for the poor; and (3) a combination of
The nation has, admittedly, been unsuccessful in redistributing the
both.
wealth
most
so that increasing wealth
generally offers
the most
promise
to the
people.
Of immdiate
concern,
is the pressing
need
to rebuild the
and to construct decent housing for the poor.
this cannot be done quickly and at reasonable
cities
of America
Without the use of the new technology
cost.
So, while I think we can handle and contain jurisdictional grabs for the work of
industrial unions, the problems of society in this area are likely to be increased
as a result of these decisions because the Court has placed a stamp of approval
It may be that the
on the maintenance of the status quo in the building industry.
only answer to the societal problem magnified by the Carpenters! decision is legislative.
Ramifications
The philosophy of the majority
with respect to our demands:
of these
of decisions
Decisions
is generally
-
8-
on UAW
1967
helpful to UAW,
Demands
especially
The
April
Officers
28,
1967
(2) to eliminate unfair and substandard
(1) to restrict in-plant subcontracting;
s
dard
stan
and
jobs
ect
prot
to
(3)
and
out
ed
farm
work
on
ucti
prod
competition on
from the threat of below par Canadian labor costs.
ry
eve
and
h
eac
ng
chi
cou
of
ity
ess
nec
the
ate
ter
rei
to
I am prompted, however,
the
of
rds
nda
sta
and
k
wor
the
g
tin
tec
pro
of
ms
ter
in
s
and
dem
se
the
of
one
d
use
be
ld
cou
that
le
tab
g
nin
gai
bar
the
at
k
tal
any
is
re
the
If
t.
Uni
bargaining
the
h
wit
ves
sel
our
n
cer
con
to
is
do
to
ing
try
lly
rea
are
we
t
wha
that
to show
labor policies of other employers, we can have serious problems.
ity
ess
nec
the
of
rd
Boa
and
rs
ice
Off
the
d
ise
adv
e
hav
I
rs,
yea
1/2
3
t
pas
For the
of
y
lit
ibi
oss
imp
and
y
lit
ega
ill
the
of
and
ch
roa
app
rds
nda
sta
of the work and
on
isi
dec
s
Thi
s.
use
cla
k
wor
ion
-un
non
or
k
wor
uck
str
dle
refusal to han
sharply reinforces that view.
s"
ce
an
st
um
rc
ci
the
der
'un
s,
ion
ent
int
s
on'
Uni
the
The Brennan opinion asks: Were
on
uni
y
isf
sat
to
d
ate
cul
cal
ly
cal
cti
"ta
or
t
uni
the
in
rk
wo
ve
really to preser
h
suc
on,
iti
pos
pro
l
era
gen
a
‘As
ts:
ges
sug
He
''
e?
er
wh
se
el
objectives
by
nt
me
ce
la
sp
di
of
eat
thr
the
of
ss
ne
te
mo
re
circumstances might include the
the
n
ee
tw
be
ons
ati
rel
or
lab
of
y
tor
his
the
the banned product or services,
ty
ali
son
per
ic
om
on
ec
the
and
ted
cot
boy
be
union and the employers who would
of the industry. ''
afford to ignore.
not
can
we
ch
whi
es
cas
se
the
in
us
for
ce
dan
There is gui
ge
wa
l
ua
eq
and
ng
ti
ac
tr
on
bc
su
our
t
tha
se
ca
ul
While I think we can make a powerf
te
ca
di
in
s
on
si
ci
de
e
es
th
t,
uni
the
of
s
ed
ne
the
on
ely
demands are predicated sol
es.
lin
e
es
th
g
on
al
gy
te
ra
st
g
in
at
ti
go
ne
our
g
in
ar
ep
the necessity of pr
1
st.
fir
at
did
I
as
t
gh
li
a
d
ba
as
in
s
on
si
On balance, I do not see these deci
r
ou
to
as
s
ew
vi
ld
he
ly
us
io
ev
pr
ng
mi
ir
nf
co
as
characterize them, however,
rights and presenting some serious problems for the future.
What
I would propose
for general
distribution
on these
cases
would
be a far
and
s
se
ca
the
of
ts
fac
the
ite
rec
d
ul
wo
We
.
mo
me
al
less candid and analytic
g
in
iz
as
ph
em
,
ms
le
ob
pr
al
et
ci
so
d
an
al
on
ti
very lightly allude to the jurisdic
y
ll
ta
to
s
se
ca
e
es
th
at
th
ew
vi
r
ou
s
er
wy
la
d
an
to regional directors, staff
ty
ri
pa
ge
wa
d
an
ng
ti
ac
tr
on
bc
su
er
ov
l
ro
nt
co
er
tt
be
confirm our right to win
t
uni
ng
ni
ai
rg
ba
the
of
s
er
mb
me
the
to
y
it
ss
ce
ne
in Canada because of the absolute
rd
ha
of
n
io
ct
ru
st
de
the
and
rk
wo
l
na
io
it
ad
tr
of
s
los
of these protections against
won
standards.
I need your comments.
SIS: vak
opeiu42
Fraternally,
PRODUCTION
Renewal without the bulldozer
Novel experiment may pave the way for rehabilitating
slum dwellings without tearing them down—by renovating
the core and dropping in prefab kitchens and baths
A year ago, 635 East 5th St. was a
squalid, rat-infested tenement, simi-
lar to scores of other dilapidated
buildings on New York’s Lower East
Side. But last week No. 635 became
the proving ground for a unique construction idea aimed at reducing
the cost and the time required to
rehabilitate slum dwellings.
“Instant rehabilitation,” as the
method has been dubbed, makes it
unnecessary to raze a building. First,
an 8-ft. square hole is cut into the
roof and into each of the floors di-
rectly below. This shaft is then used
to haul out debris as the building’s
interior is renovated. When the job
is finished, the shaft is filled with
pre-assembled
kitchen-bathroom
units. Cranes
lower. the $8,100 units
into place through the roof opening,
stacking them one on top of another, sealing the shaft.
Worth the effort. No. 635 and two
other buildings are being rehabilitated by T. Y. Lin & Associates, Los
Angeles consulting engineers, whose
work has been commissioned by the
Carol W. Haussamen Foundation of
New York. Obviously, last week’s
experiment has far-reaching implications: New York has some 58,000
tenements built in the 1890s, before
modern standards for ventilation and
sanitation were adopted. Says Edward Rice, president of Conrad Engineers, a T.Y.
Lin subsidiary:
“There is such a tremendous need
for better housing in New York that
it is worth
rehabilitating
these
buildings.”
Elsewhere, private ventures simi-
Pre-assembled kitchen-bathroom unit is hoisted into renovated building in a test of “instant rehabilitation.”
BUSINESS WEEK
December
10, 1966
PRODUCTION
173
Making deliveries of energy in the form of
the world’s finest coal and fuel oil calls for
energy, teamwork, and timing. With 95
years of experience, Sprague’s marketing
teams have developed the ability and
know-how to move the right form
:
of energy to the right place at the }
right time. And Sprague skills are
used in the handling and transshipment of industrial raw. materials of many kinds. This is
Marketing in Motion! Another
name for SPRAGUE ENERGY. Our
brochure will tell you the story.
Fuels and raw materials for the world’s industries.
eS
ee semen
SPRAGUE
C. H.
Dosen.
ENERG Y
oe & SON C CO.,
SINCE
1870
C. H. SPRAGUE & SON CO.
200 Park Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017,
Tel. (212) 697-5060
125 High Street, Boston, Mass. 02110, Tel. (617) 542-7807
Money Tight
Labor Scarce
©@
Plant Full
Expand your business
without capital
investment
by using our
Contract Design
and Manufacturing
Services.
Call us...collect
216-746-7211 Ext. 252
Ask for Mr. Robert N. Griffith,
General Manager, Industrial Sales
50 years experience
in precision metal cabinetry.
=) MANUFACTURING DIVISION
REPUBLIC
STEEL
CORPORATION
1315 Albert Street
Youngstown, Ohio 44505
174
PRODUCTION
Self-contained kitchen-bathroom unit, shown after final factory assembly (left)
is trucked to destination and lowered into a shaft by crane (right).
lar to the Haussamen project are
also under way. Among those participating are U.S. Steel, U.S. Gypsum,
and
Dow
Chemical.
The
aim
in all cases is to rehabilitate old
buildings at approximately one-third
of what it would generally cost to
build new apartment houses from
scratch.
The federal government will draw
on the experience of the several organizations testing rehabilitation in
its plans to renovate slum areas of
Philadelphia,
Boston,
Chicago,
Cleveland, and other cities.
Other experiments. An example of
other attempts at slum renovation is
that being carried out by the KateMaremount Foundation, a Chicago
philanthropic
organization.
The
foundation has bought five buildings on which rehabilitation work is
to begin shortly. What makes its
plans unique is that the tenants involved have been organized into the
Metro North Association and are
working closely with the designers
and architects to assure that the
finished products: will satisfy their
aspirations for better housing.
The Chicago experiment has another unconventional aspect in that
none of the present tenants will be
displaced. Rather, they will continue
living in the houses when the renovation is finished. The aim is not to
reconstitute the ghetto with gleaming new touches but to provide decent housing for those who have
chosen to live there.
Last April, when Mayor John V.
Lindsay of New York demonstrated
“instant rehabilitation” with a toy
crane for the press, the whole thing
looked like child’s play. But when
the real thing was tried last week,
complications set in. For example,
when the kitchen-bathroom units
were
lowered
into No.
635,
defects
in the 70-year-old building caused it
to rest an inch above the existing
floor.
Lessons.
Nevertheless,
after
months of tests with various materials
and
methods,
and
other
ex-
periments to determine how the renovation could be made to dovetail
with existing building codes, it is
expected that work on the two other
buildings can be finished more rapidly. The second building is expected
to take six to 10 days. And by the
time the third building is aanhet it
is planned to have a 60-man crew
finish the project in six eight-hour
days—the 48-hour goal of “instant
rehabilitation.”
Already,
problems
that
have
cropped up during various renovation experiments are leading to new
products and techniques, says Rusco
Industries, Inc., a Cleveland building supply manufacturer. One example is the company’s pre-finished,
adjustable window assembly that
can be installed by two men in a
half hour. Timber Engineering Co.
of Washington, D.C., is selling metal
fasteners to reinforce sagging floor
beams, and Union Carbide has developed a plastic floor-leveling device. End
BUSINESS
WEEK
December
10, 1966
Note
General
We
projecting
in
account
ALD
NOTES--EDITORIAN
and
Percys!
family
single
taxes
proposals.
respective
of
to
allocated
proposal
that
a rent
example
is
$3.33
than
for
per
room
per
Senator
the
Percy
Senator
the
to
cost
Javits'
Senator
of
structure
additional
$0
Percy
Senator
the
for
higher
in
results
which
equivalent
the
in
results
This
proposals.
to
in taxes
$60
minimum
Percy
Senator
the
have
we
while
job
rehabilitation
taxes
ascribed
have
we
tables
of both
columns
first
in the
example,
$100
not
are
that
computations
the
in
the
in
inherent
necessarily
month
Javits
example.
There
the
does
is
exemption
the
evaluation
this,
the
specify
not
between
assistance
tax
we
two
of
would
Basically,
differences
the
to
under
his
proposals
probably
two
being
the
The
not
merits.
are
the
necessarily
If we
taxes
inherently
contemplated
the
terms
had
under
we
in
into
an
enter
time
the
apply
imputed
difference
similar
and
not
legislation
Javits
although
Consequently
equalize
programs
in
tax
exemption
should
relative
their
either
plan.
could
community
plan.
of
degree
local
the
why
reason
inherent
no
same
percent
of
about
assumptions
different
slightly
made
have
We
homes.
relative
proposals
Javits'
Senator
rehabilitation
the
to
Senator
represent
) which
1 and
Tables
comparing
in
taken
be
should
For
TECHNICAL
1 and
Tables
Care
future,
the
into
programs
these
should be taken into
factor
This
per year.
1.5 percent
of about
factor
carrying
and
rents
that
estimate
inflationary
an inherent
have
charges
to
two
with
interest
50
taxes
reevaluate
plans.
the
major
rates.
*%
2
Table
Table
3
to
local
tax
for
communities
exchequer
of
such
proposals
unless
by
granted
exemption
are
they
reimbursement
Federal
provide
would
which
scheme
Javits
the
with
resist
will
which
community
bitterly
local
the
the
from
comes
subsidy
this
that
noted
linked
is
cooperatives
new
for
should
It
taxes.
in
limitation
sharp
very
the
proposals
Percy
the
from
emerge
to
appears
that
advantage
major
The
level.
income
to $7,000
$5,000
the
for
be very useful
but would
of $5 ,000
incomes
annual
below
families
of most
resources
the
beyond
be
housing
monthly
The
be
would
probably
program
this
under
expense
communities.
these
Table
ths
that,increase
Note
of
Javits
tax
the
consent
for
could
the
$100.90
oth
eliminate,taxes
tax
loans
interest
exemption which we have
program
rental
for
low
communities
local
this
of
from
examination
of this
abatment
be
cut
minimum
program,
assumed
down
table.
$5
per
some
rehabilitation
period
as
can
advantage
exemption,
month
job
to
from
as
the
much
job--assuming
be
done
with
combined
Should
for the proposal.
generous
to more
from
rehabilitation
rehabilitation
maximum
for
for
major
the
reflect
rehabilitation
for
proposals
long-term
50%
apparent
the
elimination
to
5
Table
The
is
which
payment
readily
not
90 percent
from
shifting
the
by
accompanied
is
mortgage
percent
100
of
in
charges
carrying
under
rents
under
$65.00
per
month
$12
per
month
the
as
a willingness
our
tax
to
exemption-
—
Table6
charges
carrying
as
in...the
Javits
for
execution
definition
to
the
cover
New
federal
to
ofa
middle
York
low income
law,
State
legislation
encompass
construction.
would
with
income
the
the
level
of
low income"
which
has
an income
Act
the
make
as
families
still
it
as
in New
are
definition
of incomes
termed
of
that
221(d)(3)
State
low
income
income
could
market
interest
Program.
has
rate
The
extended
been
the latter,
under
families".
Under
families
afford
in the
successful
Supplement
"low
public
contradiction
for
technically
although
to
defined
is
y
occupancin
for
York
Javits!
oe
the MAXLMUMs
useless
Rent
and
proposal
phrase
a fundamental
the FHA
Federal
family
kis
his
below
of 1937,
in fact,
new construction
association
program's
is,
This
which
legislation
with
Housing
U.S.
dwellings."
housing
who
or individual
family
prescribed
rents
"families
to
housing
the
"a
these
inconsistent
are
rents
the
Gicicseuedontens?
construction
new
for
that
is
proposals
limit
that
finding
A major
of
examination
from
emerges
Javits
is
too
type
restrictive
new
1.--FINANCIAL
TABLE
FOR
PARAMETERS
L CCL
aaNet
cumstances
LOW INCOME FAMILY OWNERSHIP
SENATOR PERCY'S PROPOSALS
EE
CCL
_ Withurban
Minimum
rehabilitation
item
af
Acquisition cost
Rehabilitation cost=
Total development cost
Equity payment b/
Mortgage
Annual
operating
Debt
service
©
Taxes d/
Maintenance
utilities?/
Total
Monthly Housing
a/
ern
a
ae
~
300
LAC
LC
CLOT
ANAL
OO
LO
Three bedroom - one
renewal assistance
OAL
ALL LLL
family
$2,000
$7,000
ALAA AAA
house
Without
Minimum
rehabilitation
rehabilitation
$2,000
$5,000
LALLA
UNDER
ED
urban renewal
Moderate
rehabilitation
assistance
Maximum
rehabil-
itation
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
750
$
$5,000
$7,000
$12,000
600
$
$11,400
$9 , 000
$
HOMES
FAMILY
A
$), 000
$10,000
$12,000
$
600
11,100
$9,000
$ 50
ALLE LLL
ALAA
Maximum
Moderate
rehabiljitation
SINGLE
REHABILITATED.
150
costs
&
expense
bonding, builder's overhead and profit, professional
financing charges and contingency allowances.
(architect,
of 5 percent.
c/ Forty year
e/
$
Includes cost of renovation,
etc.) services, carrying and
b/ Maximum
d/
$2,000
$), 000
$6,000
CALL
OF
loan at 3 percent
estimated
interest-- 0113262
pre-rehabilitation
taxes
for
deteriorated
"Frozen"
at
FHA 203b
includes
estimates for processing mortgage insurance on
materials, repairs, heat, utilities and hazard
one
family
existing homes,
insurance,
3rd
structures.
quarter,
1966
-
legal,
TABLE
Total
oe
eS
development
FOR
PARAMETERS
2,--FINANCIAL
eget =
af
$10,000
Annual
operating
Debt ggrvice
Taxes—
Maintenance
costs
&c/
and utilities—
Total”
Monthly housing
ef
Includes
carrying
b/ Maximum
e/
200
55
95
NEW
SINGLE
- One Family
House
$1), 000
700
$13 300
|
2,0
55
$
FAMILY
575
280
55
HOMES
$16, 000
800
$15,200
$
$ 1,310
$1,435
965
$80, ue
$ 1,070
$89 ,20
$ 1,170
$97 650
$ 1,275
$106, 30
$109.20
$99.20
$117. 90
professional (architect, legal, etc. ) services, ©
acquisition cost and contingency allowance.
interest--,03262.
50 percent
of total
FHA Sec. 203b estimates for processing
structures, 3rd quarter, 1966-includes
insurance.
f/ Fifty percent
tax exemption.
320
E55
of 5 percent.
percent--Assessment
660
$ 1,190
$
loan at 3 percent
UNDER
$1,065
construction cost, bonding,
and financing shavzen, land
c/ Forty year
d/ Four
$12,000
$
10
$
Bedroom
600
$11,100
$88.80
expense
Total with tax relief £/
Monthly housing expense
a/
Three
500
$9,500
Equity payment —
Mortgage- =
OF
LOW INCOME FAMILY OWNERSHIP
SENATOR PERCY'S PROPOSALS
development
costs.
mortgage insurance on proposed one family
materials, repairs, heat, utilities and hazard
Table
3e-=-INANCIAL
PARAMETERS
FOR
LOW
INCOME
FAMILY
OWNERSHIP
Garden
Construction
room
basis
Development copt=
Kgquity payment—
Mortgage
Monthly
Debt
Taxes
/
costs
costs
and
of )E/
Utilities (gas and
electricity)
Less: miscellaneous
Carrying charges
Per
income
apartment basis
Development cost
Rgquity
payment
carrying
.
charges
One bedroom unit
Two bedroom unit
Three bedroom unit
ie
Mortgage
$ 3,000
$ 3,000
2,850
3,000
$10.25
755%
*
$10.80
= -7,608/
2eL0
2 «LO
1.85
1.85
$21.35
$21.95
$1h,h00/
One bedreom uni te
‘Two bedroem unit=/
Three bedroom unit’
Monthly
type
Mortgage
150
service’
(in lieu
COOPERATIVE
100 percent
percent
55
operating
Operating
reserves
NEW
(Non-fire-proof)
type
Item
Per
OF
$1h,ho0L/
$525
-
900
7
675
$7.70
96.10
128.10
es
$76.80
98.80
131.70
APARTMENTS
UNDER
SENATOR
High rise-fireproof
100 percent
95 percent
Mortgage
Mortgage
$ 1,000
200
3,800
$ ),000
$13.60
$1.0
8.70°/
2.50
a reh/
11,000
8.80°/
2.60
1.85
—,5on/
$2565
$27 015
$19, 2008/
$19, 2008/
$ 700
900
1200
$ 89.80
115.0
153.90
$ 95.00
122.20
162.90
PERCY'S
PROPOSALS
FOOTNOTES:
ae
Table
3
professional (architect, legal, etc.) services,
acquisition cost and contingency allowance
construction cost, bonding,
and financing charges, land
Includes
carrying
Maximum of 5 percent
Forty year loan at 3 percent
interest--.0)3262
$82 per room per year plus 3 percent vacancy reserve
$96 per room per year plus 3 percent vacancy reserve
Payment in lieu of taxes of 10 percent of the gross residential
equivalent to pre-construction taxes
Open parking spaces for 75 percent of the units, $5.00
$18.00 per unit per year washing and vending machines
Open
parking
Mean
number
$22.00
for
per unit washing
1 bedroom,
3.5
rooms
6.0
rooms
eS
spaces
rooms
of
rooms
50 percent
per
60
percent
the
units,
and vendihg machines
apartment
- 2 bedroom,
— kitchen
and
dining
- kitchen
and
dining
- kitchen
of
and dining
- }.8,
$10.00
assumes
30 percent
apartment
living
room,
space,
living
room,
living room,
one bedrooms,
three
10 percent
of
distribution
two bedrooms,
to be
10 percent vacancy,
a month,
- 3 bedroom
space,
space,
a month,
assumed
rent
bedrooms,
one
vacancy,
20
percent
bath
one bath
one
and
a half
bathe
-
h.--FINANCIAL
Table
With
|
|
Item
- Rehabilitation?
Total development
Equity payment
Mortgage
Annual
operating
“Debt servicel/
Taxes<
Maintenance
| Total
Monthly
|
cost
costs
a/
,
expense
Total with l percent interest®/
Monthly housing expense
Total
100
mortgage
&
Total
lie
100 percent mortgage
percent interest
&
percent
3.5 percent interest
Monthly housing expense
Monthly housing expense
Three
renewal
bedroom- one
assistance
Moderate
Rehabilitation
family
Maximum
Rehabilitation
house
- 90 percent
Without
Minimum
Rehabilitation
mortgage
renewal
urban
assistance
Moderate
Rehabilitation
Maximum
Rehabilitation
$ 2,000
$ 2,000
$ 2,000
$ 5,000
* 5,000
$ 5,000
6,000
600
$ 5,100
9,000
900
$ 8,100
12,000
1,200
$10, 800
9,000
900
$ 8,100
12,000
1, 200
#10, 800
15,000
1,500
$13,500
1, ,000
& utilities—
housing
urban
Minimum
Rehabilitation
Acquisition cost
|
PARAMETERS FOR LOW INCOME FAMILY OWNERSHIP OF REHABILITATED
SINGLE FAMILY HOMES UNDER SENATOR JAVITS! PROPOSAL
7,000
lh, 000
10,000
10,000
7,000
$255
$385
$ 510
$385
$ 510
$ 60
hho
lho
hho
lihO
Ve
Lo
60
90
90
120
120
150
$755
$62.90
$915
$76 «30
$1,070
$89.20.
$915
$76.30
$1,070
$89.20
$1, 230
$102 450
$780
$65.00
b9L5
$78.90
$1,120
$93.30
$95
$78 90
$1,120
$93.30
$1,285
$107.10
$785
$65.10
$960
$80 «00
$1,130
$91.20
$960
$80.00
$1,130
$9620
$1, 305
$108.80
$995
|
$1,180
~
$1,365
$810
$67 50
$995
$82.90
$1,180
$98.30
|
$82.90
$98.30
$113580
\
(Og:5?
| 365
4/2, 50
Footnotes:
ae
Table
s
r'
de
il
bu
g,
in
nd
bo
,
on
ti
va
no
re
of
t
cos
es
Includ
d
an
ng
yi
rr
ca
,
es
ic
rv
se
)
c.
et
l,
ga
le
,
(architect
allowance.
Fifty year
loan
at 3.5 percent
interest
plus
overhead and profit, professional
financing charges and contingency
-5 percent
mortgage
insurance--.0l7633
al
tot
of
t
en
rc
pe
SO
t
en
sm
es
ss
-a
te
ra
t
en
rc
pe
h
n
Fifty percent exemptio
es,
hom
ng
ti
is
ex
on
e
nc
ra
su
in
ge
ga
rt
mo
ng
si
es
oc
pr
for
s
FHA-203b estimate
1966 ~ includes
Fifty year
materials,
repairs,
loan at 1.0 percent
heat, utilities
interest
plus
and hazard insurance
.5 percent
mortgage
/s
development cost.
3rd quarter,
insurance-=.051550
\
e
oie
‘ iar"
=3ihe.
~
?
ri
a35
ois
s
3
;
|
|
}
‘
;
:
|
7
5
s
=
a
.
a
.
—
:
:
3a
Ss
7
ee
|
os *
ee
+,
See
—
eg
er
.
¢
ROPOSAL
AY ETS:
SENATOR
eee”
pe
a
os
e
.
ne
3
.
:
*
:
i
*
‘
ay
et
,
2
.
2
i
ee
Ps
:
2
kj.
,
z
.
.
*
=
me
5
é
«
.
.
J
9
Fes
gas
4
Table 5..emverat, PARAMETERS FOR, REHABILITATED, MULTI-FA
UNDER
ee
x
%
eg
ae
oe
ae
eS
- es
f
ar
Ms
a
Met ee eee
"
3
“
;
sy
a
2
‘i
:
}
“e
oe
es
*
ae <5
4
2.
*
ae Se
.
Poe)
e
ees
:
-
<s
of
3
|
5
:
4g
.
‘
7
us
i:
;
: Begs
tae
ue
oe
~
+ Ttation | fi
ge 000 | as
2] $1,000
ee
000
yy
:
tation
$5 000
500
$),,500
2 Fae
—
$8, 000
% a
BOO
"5 $7,200
Debt service =
eturn on bentiy o/
- ‘Taxes£
Maintenance
and
utilities f£/”
tal operating
ly rent
)
cost
foral
eee | cost-100 percent mort: age
at 3.5 percent
Monthly
rent
interest
Total operating cost-LOO percent mortgage
at 4.0 percent
Monthly rent
interest
|
-§
.
!
oo
&
¢
$
$
210
30
hep
180
TO
3GS08
808
$67.30
828
$69.00
|
-
alk
7
rehabi
i
4
Ps
“2
$82,
$9,000. 4
he
$8,100.
st
ae
gi
Pe
ao
ae
Is
ss
BES:
|
=
-
i tt* » $24,000 (3a
a ;
Sf
rehabil-
itation
pea)
~
7
ey
ca
|
: eps Medewits
ve
‘
2
‘180
$
969
a BO
ogee
-$1;005°, :
=
$83.80
$1,036
$86, 30
$ 1,2h5
$103.80
$
897 —
$7.80
|
$1,106
$92.20
$.1,315-.2:
$109.60
Sel a
ery pape
5
,
6.<--FINANCIAL
Table
nr
FOR
PARAMETERS
NEW
MULTI-FAMILY
HOUSING
RENTAL
Per
'
of
ro
ep
ir
-f
on
-n
pe
ty
Garden
'
al
nt
Re
:
ve
ti
ra
pe
oo
Rental
’
t
en
rc
pe
0
10
t!
en
rc
pe
90
'
t
en
rc
pe
0
10
t!
en
rc
pe
90
'
t
en
rc
pe
0
10
t!
en
rc
190 pe
ge
ga
rt
mo
'
ge
ga
rt
mo
_'
e
ag
tg
or
.m
‘'
ge
ga
rt
mo
1
ge
ga
rt
mo
'
ge
ga
rt
mo
‘'
_
|
basis
room
payment
costs
operating
| Debt
Return
on equity=
t
i
a
,
Taxesi/
Utilities
Less:
eo
a
d
electricity
‘
Monthly rent or
carrying charges
apartment
Development
basis
One bedroom unit®’
bedroom unit©/
Two
Three bedroom unit
Monthly
||
|
|
|
|
|
,
|
charges
a
—
e
e
e
e
Two bedroom ‘unit
Three bedroom unit
Monthly
7
Two bedroom unit)
Three
bedroom
unit
-
~~"
ee
T.10
F12F0,
e12e
1.50
=: 160,20
162,00
bes
a
$$
98,00
em
pegeateterest-ebel®
—
126,00 168.00
OF
ee
4
|
$2675
$11, bode”
$ 10803..5500
138.00
|
=
$8106.8.60
90
1.00
7
$ 97.30
$ 83.90
$ 88.20
166,80
143.70
151.20
.- 12.10
107.80
1/
li2sko
$ ——
‘
:
Be
ee
0
.0
20
$1
151,80
"206,40
|
$19, 200
;
7
$125.10
160.90
Zi
ae
-
$118193,.0000
204400
:
s
Je litgsO ©.
.
--
Ss
ely
a
,
Q
5
s ces/
@J>5
en
$3050
si
$28 ,90
$19,800=
-
-
1.85
—~*
1/
-
-
1,800
,
$3},.00
~
~
1,350
et
$19,800
Ralie re
selk/
Ve
me
$3), e40
i)
B06a0e
k/
>, 50—
)
~
— oll
;
1.85
ke /
waste
+h
-
1.285
:/
|
$17 650
L000
3,600
4,00
-
$ mye
$ 1
t51g5 = s51oc5 ’
1285
$ 1,050
ae
°
|
e3.l45
$1, hoo?”
ec
.
$ hae
ee
~
)Ou
|
3,960
$11.90
a
e
‘
3,000
$23.06
~
|
—
charges--nort,
4.One bedroomitmit
~
-
oie
|
$1, 4002/
~
/
:/
a
$2770
$11, 002/
cost
1.85
ssintng hilt
|
$27-00
payment
Equity
1.85
od/
—
}
l
a
305
30.75
1685
miscellaneous
~
~
~
|
$ 3,200
$10.70
$12.70
3.75
(gas &
A
2,700
3,200
1.60
income
Per
-
ie
v
eric!’
$ +
$ 3,200
2,880
eu Mortgage!
= Monthly
|
$ “a
“Development cost2/
Equity
:
- fireproof
Cooperative
'
! 90 percent! 100 percent
! mortgage
'_ mortgage
Rise
High
Item
PROPOSAL
JAVITS!
SENATOR
UNDER
in/
ef
|
$19 , 200—
:
:
:
a.
$113010..1000
-173°ho
ae
]
$113067..7300
A
ao
$12h,10
$105.0
$111.30
212,70
180.60
190.80
159.50
an s20
143.10
|
Footnotes:
ae
be
ce
d.
e.
f.
ge
he
ie
je
k.
1.
me
Ne
0»
pe
qe
Table
Includes
6
construction
cost,
bonding,
professional
acquisition cost and contingency allowance.
90 percent
Fifty year loan at 3.5 percent plus .5 percent
|
Six percent
$90 per room plus 6 percent vacancy reserve
$82 per room plus
$100 per room plus
$96 per room plus
3 percent vacancy
6 percent vacancy
3 percent vacancy
Fifty percent exemption
Open parking spaces for
Open parking spaces for
Mean number
Mean number
of rooms
of rooms
per
per
apartment
apartment
rooms
= kitchen
and
dining
6.0
rooms
- kitchen
and
dining
Fifty year
- kitchen
mortgage
legal,
etc.)
insurance--level
services,
!
debt
carrying
service
=
and dining
loan at ).0 percent
and financing
charges,
land
.0h7633
reserve
reserve
reserve
percent rate - assessment 70 percent of total development cost
75 pereent of the units, $5.00 a month, 10 percent vacancy, $18 per
60 percent of the units, $10.00 a month, 10 percent vacancy $22 per
325
h.e5 rooms
(architect,
- 4.5;
- 1.8;
space,
space,
space,
assumes
assumes
living room,
living
living
interest
plus
room,
room,
apt.
apt.
one
distribution
distribution
bedroom,
one
of 30%
of 20%
bath
two bedroomsone
, bath
three
.5 percent
bedrooms,
mortgage
one
and
- 1 bedroom,
- 1 bedroom,
half
baths
insurance--.051550
50%
50%
unit
unit
per
per
year
year
washing
washing
- 2 bedroons, 20%
- 2 bedroons, 30%
and
and
vending
vending
- 3 bedrooms
- 3 bedrooms
machines
machines
Are
Cities
Our
Dying?
by EDWARD
J. LOGUE
Administrator of Redevelopment, City of Boston
Presidents and pundits, bankers and
civil rights workers join other publicminded citizens in expressing their alarm
about the state of America’s cities. They
are right. In a society of rising affluence
too much of the inner city is sinking into pervasive decay.
Some observers despair and propose
the city be abandoned. Others suggest
panaceas, usually governmental, which
will allegedly cure urban cancer. Quite
recently suggestions have been made
that perhaps the present enterprise system should take on the job of curing the
city’s ills.
In this confusion of analysis and prescription we often seem to lose sight of
the basic purpose for which the city
exists, of how hard it is to build a great
city and how inadequate any alternative
to the city proves to be.
| have walked the streets of great cities
around the world wondering how and
why they came to be. They are marvelous in their diversity. Each city has
its own special emphasis—perhaps as a
port,
a seat
of
government,
a center
of manufacturing. Yet they all have one
thing in common—the city is a place of
exchange—of goods, of course, but
equally important, of ideas.
No suburban shopping center, no landscaped industrial park, no elegant, cloistered research center, no system of instant remote communication is going to
of our civilization. In earlier times we
accepted this and made our cities, particularly their centers, graceful and
proud. Today many deny the city the
right to be important, to be beautiful,
to be cared about.
a new factory—are made only in areas
entirely safe. Do we realize what we do
when we rule entire sections of a community off limits? Why are we surprised
when those millions thus cut off from
society decide that they do not belong
Dey
and do not care?
Technology has made it possible for the
very important people who dominate
Our economy to use only a piece of the
city quite comfortably, regardless of the
decay that is never more than a mile
from their seats of power. These powerful men are usually those who have done
least to make the city livable. As wealth
and power increasingly ignore land and
political boundaries, it is possible to
grow up, prosper and die without ever
having been a citizen of a city in the
| believe our government must have an —
important role in saving our cities be-
cause
it, in effect, is saving itself. | be-
lieve that the education of a million
slum children, giving them a chance to
become part of America, is more impor- |
tant than putting a new town on the.
moon. | believe our national priorities
should be reappraised and much more
governmental attention given to our
cities. Even more, however, | believe
that the private enterprise system must
Athenian sense; a fund raiser for alma
mater, or a board member on a com-
face the challenge of the slums.
' munity chest agency, seems to be the
average limit. The idea of active citizenship stillis embarrassing to many business leaders.
The imagination and the drive that has
made our system the most. productive
in the world must be turned to the task
| believe we can improve our cities and
we can do so quickly without waiting
for the necessary but cumbersome pub-
Maybe it means we should overhaul the
Internal Revenue Code to make it as
attractive to invest in the slums as it is
to buy tax-exempt bonds or search out
oil and gas. If we do, we might just
connect up 10 million presently forsaken people with the mainstream of
American life. There is still time. Let us
make a start before it is too late.
|
of renewing our cities.
lic aid programs, vital as they are. The
first thing we can do is to improve their
tone, decide we care, allow a concern
for the city as a whole and its future to
guide private decisions.
When banks redline a blighted area and
shut off investment they may protect
against short run risk. But there is a
cumulative loss of confidence that can
take away the primacy of the urban center where the jostling of old and new
ideas shape the world we will live in.
change a whole city’s faith in itself. Un-
The city is not obsolete. It is the center
cisions—a branch bank, a supermarket,
fortunately, most
new
investment
de-
As a contribution to man’s search for answers to today’s challenges, Alcan
Aluminium Limited is presenting this series of statements by leading authorities in various fields. A multinational corporation, Alcan has a special interest in seeking answers. This is the second of a series.
Alcan has a world of experience in aluminum...
people strong.
“
100 countries
wide, 60,000
In the United States, Alcan is a vital source of aluminum ingot for industry
and a fabricator of aluminum sheet, cable, metal powders and other products.
For reprints of this essay write to Alcan, 620 Fifth Ave., New York, N.Y. 10020
A
WORLD
OF
EXPERIENCE
IN
ALUMINUM
Fait
oF
9961
440d
4S9104
,
OZ
9IDiq
SLOIFOUd
LON
Eo
Ke)
4p
a a
uolyounr aayxnoMIWZZ
Z ON
40g
489104.9Z
DIluysNpuy
ysamUyNoS.¢
SOlsIIIHY
GON
Ata
EON
ZON
LON
Adin
Abid
Adin
ea cae
L°ON
4044URD
48}fua>
:
one)
:
ONISNOH
TON
LON
epee heeias oC
ee
Aw
|
.
SLDIfOUd
sSsauIsNng
cd \ ee ee ee ee
al
’
|osjuar.
42!44SIQ
Ajissaaiun.1Z
Ajissaaiun.oz
Afissaaiun.6|
sPjOquiny -usy
-Og
ens
a __
LNIWdO13A3034N/NOILVWAUISNOD:
3
ae
u oa
_
ay
w
NVOIHDIW
ave
ssauIsng
EON
lta
ae
USpP|x
-1S8
L11Oua¥1L4gG
a
fe)
BSNS
4fOl4ysiq
Ajissaaiun-7Z
|OIIpaw.¢|
‘.
JOWN|IDD-7g
$94Dg -pauipy.
44D UOLINGIAIsIq
aj;Dsajoum.
445
UuOlyNgI4ysig
aj;psajoum.
"ON
[| Pl4esNPuy
apis
jysam-
CON
[OIIpEw-Ol
We 60-7 Ve
JII1aNd-
YSG-EZ
|O1sUsa>y
ee A eee bod Be Fata hd ect
2 ced See sik, Ie? Ee Ue
tasey 3 ae 8
TC ON
UuDpPIsaUS
hee e heehee Roy
44NO>
AllD
j
;
j
}
/
SLOIFfOUdd
.
UE
L1ouLlid
ONISNOH
anv
I11aNd
ER Me AAR Dae ERP fe
|dOsfuar.
ee oP
ne
LON
440qdPoomuyg.
EON
442g
A2
LON
Festalae 2 Medal
449d
poomu)3.
a4saADjd}.
4
.
F
oe
:
ELLIE Syroe UE mae) Lele LSE]
y 41 eek
SEV Tolle ea Cole P etl ame cel
ed
ae ona
VON
$404-SIOUIBAIT.7 6
UOIJIUNS-4JOUIBA -1
TELAT IPI eeL IPL) Wey
\
’
eS
K
SLOIIFOUd
3
Eloy mel
Atid
oP ny, Wee
Ajisuaaiun-¢y
44Dg
aBajjoy.zy
Buiwokm-aiw
jsubiQ- 1p
P102U0
=2DW-OY
NOILWAUYISNOD.-
Saly¥ssse
NASY9YSA3
|
-99
a) Ve
A
GISISHLNOS
5 od
4SD9-4O14DId
ORE Foo eh ee oP ney V0
AVM34344
|
Ley Vy
./9
NOISSIWWOD)D
7 A13143N335Y9
OEP
PUDIO
SIONYSAII
UOSIAIDEY -4BAIY
ih: BAe Peer
MAY = 8 1967
—y
PETER J. PAGE
THE MAYOR
BETHEL PARK
OF
OF
OFFICE
BOROUGH
Library Avenue
5100 West
MAYOR
Bethel Park, Pennsylvania 15102
Telephone, 835-5454
May
Dear
1967
5,
Sir:
to
nt
va
le
re
t
en
em
at
st
a
nd
Enclosed you will fi
ys
Wa
e
us
Ho
e
th
re
fo
be
ld
he
ly
nt
ce
re
re
we
at
th
gs
in
ar
he
e
th
s.
ll
Mi
D.
er
lb
Wi
n
a
m
s
s
e
r
g
n
o
C
by
ed
ar
sh
as
e,
te
it
mm
Co
& Means
ey
th
h
ic
wh
in.
er
nn
ma
e
th
e,
ak
st
at
es
su
is
e
th
g
in
ew
In revi
u
yo
k
in
th
Ih
e,
om
tc
ou
nt
ue
eq
bs
su
r
ei
th
d
an
d
te
di
pe
ex
were
al
re
ry
ve
e
th
at
th
r
ea
cl
o
to
will agree that it is all
st
mu
,
ns
ze
ti
Ci
or
ni
Se
r
ou
of
ny
ma
o
to
r
fa
by
d
ce
fa
a,
mm
dile
be resolved and done so quickly.
ot
nn
ca
e
us
ca
is
th
at
th
nd
ta
I think you must unders
on
ng
ti
ac
ns
ze
ti
ci
of
dy
bo
or
n
ze
ti
ci
e
on
y
an
by
d
de
ci
de
be
on
rs
pe
y
er
ev
of
rt
fo
ef
ve
ti
ec
ll
co
e
th
es
ir
qu
re
It
n.
their ow
er
ov
ng
lo
is
ns
ze
ti
Ci
or
ni
Se
r
ou
r
fo
lp
he
at
th
es
iz
al
who re
que.
your
full
office,
motion
I
sincerely
hope
consideration
offer
whatever
and
that
you
through
support
you
will
the
may
give
use
feel
thanks
for
your
anticipated
Sincerely,
PIP:iv
,
(
your
that
matter
this
facilities/
deserves.
Many
0}
of
this
i xeRro |
1 QOwr yf
XERO
OOMy |
cooperation.
worthy
“77
PETER J. PAGE
MAYOR
THE MAYOR
BETHEL PARK
OF
OF
OFFICE
BOROUGH
Library Avenue
Bethel Park, Pennsylvania 15102
5100 West
Telephone,
27,
April
Honorable Wilber D. Mills
Chairman of the Ways & Means
Building
Rayburn
c/o
1967
Committee
C.
D.
25,
Washington,
835-5454
Congressman:
Dear
on
t
en
mm
co
to
y
it
un
rt
po
op
is
th
ke
ta
I would like to
by
e
te
it
mm
Co
ur
yo
to
ed
ct
re
di
ly
nt
ce
re
re
remarks which we
y
ll
ta
to
a
t
en
es
pr
re
t
no
y
ma
While his proposal
Walter Reuther.
the
Mr.
by
d
ce
fa
ms
le
ob
pr
e
th
of
l
al
g
in
satisfactory method of answer
y
bl
ra
le
to
in
st
mo
al
an
r
de
un
g
in
er
ff
individuals who are now su
d
an
al
re
ry
ve
e
th
on
s
cu
fo
es
do
it
quate Social Security Law,
.
ns
ze
ti
ci
or
ni
se
's
on
ti
na
r
ou
of
plight of so many millions
its
From
acterized
as
a
country
the
inception,
that
on
has,
United
has
States
char-
come
to
paramount
to
occasions,
countless
been
those
inadetragic
the
s,
on
ti
na
d
ge
er
em
y
wl
ne
en
be
ve
ha
ey
th
r
he
et
wh
n,
de
od
tr
wn
do
aid of the
e
il
wh
,
de
tu
ti
at
an
ch
Su
.
es
fo
ed
sh
ui
nq
va
s
it
or
,
es
li
al
g
in
er
ff
su
(a
d
Ai
n
ig
re
Fo
of
rm
fo
e
th
in
s
ar
ll
do
of
ns
io
ll
bi
ld
to
un
g
in
st
co
s,
es
el
th
ne
no
s,
ha
),
id
pa
re
en
be
r
ve
ne
s
ha
h
ic
wh
of
ge
ta
en
rc
large pe
rfo
un
,
en
th
,
it
Is
s.
re
ca
at
th
on
ti
na
a
ed
de
in
e
ar
we
at
th
n
ow
sh
e
th
d
en
sp
on
ti
la
pu
po
r
ou
of
t
en
gm
se
a
e
rg
la
so
e
se
to
y
on
ir
tunate
d
ue
ag
pl
y,
rt
ve
po
ar
ne
of
ow
ad
sh
e
th
in
s
ve
li
r
ei
th
of
twilight years
by
the
and
area,
advanced.
inadequate
addressing
In
this
been
an
of
frustration
dependancy?
which
problems
the
are
several
solutions,
subsequent
be
it
r
he
et
wh
s,
an
pl
e
es
th
of
their
None
have
alternatives
President Johnson's
rse
ng
yi
an
mp
co
ac
r
de
oa
br
th
wi
ts
fi
ne
be
in
%
20
of
se
ea
cr
in
d
te
es
sugg
l
ra
ne
Ge
by
ed
nc
na
fi
se
ea
cr
in
%
50
a
of
on
ti
es
gg
su
s
r'
he
ut
Re
.
vices, Mr
n
ke
ta
ve
ha
s,
al
os
op
pr
r
he
ot
of
er
mb
nu
e
th
of
y
an
or
s,
nd
fu
Treasury
ct
fe
ef
s
it
or
,
ed
lv
vo
in
ed
ne
e
th
of
y
nc
ge
ur
e
th
n
io
at
er
id
ns
co
into
so
al
st
mu
o
wh
e
os
th
th
wi
t
bu
d,
ne
er
nc
co
ly
ct
re
di
e
os
th
on
ly
on
not
s
w'
la
ng
ti
is
ex
e
th
by
ed
us
ca
en
rd
bu
d
se
ea
cr
in
e
th
of
ht
ig
we
bear the
inadequacy.
vast
The
number
of
relatives
and
friends
who
are
now
‘ea
Ixrro}
COPY
ny
r
ou
of
ny
ma
of
t
or
pp
su
e
th
to
ng
ti
bu
ri
nt
co
ly
te
le
mp
co
or
partially
g
un
yo
th
wi
e
os
th
ly
al
ci
pe
es
,
ts
en
pi
ci
re
ty
ri
cu
Se
al
ci
So
present
ck
la
e
th
to
e
du
g,
in
er
ff
su
so
al
e
ar
e,
is
ra
to
n
ow
r
ei
familes of th
w.
la
ng
ti
is
ex
e
th
in
s
rm
fo
re
of suitable or effective
f
\gg
ai
XERO|
laoey
|
SERS
'XERO|
SiS
,
Wide tias
rcory
yd RO
daa
eS
Honorable
ADELA 175°
Page 2
Mills
D.
Wilber
2997
What,
problems of
is the solution?
then,
this inadequacy without
How are
further
we to cope
harmful delay?
with the
h
ic
wh
,
on
ti
ta
mi
li
gs
in
rn
ea
ng
ti
is
ex
e
th
of
l
va
mo
re
e
th
y,
ll
ia
it
In
,
me
co
in
s
hi
g
in
nt
me
le
pp
su
of
e
bl
pa
surely hampers the individual ca
n
-i
00
,5
$1
of
g
in
il
ce
t
en
es
pr
e
Th
should be immediately lifted.
t
nh
og
li
in:
t
bu
c,
ti
is
al
re
un
ly
on
excess of the base stipend is not
is
t,
en
pi
ci
re
e
th
on
s,
se
po
im
it
that
of the economic restrictions
e
rc
fo
in
re
to
e
rv
se
ly
on
t
no
d
ul
wo
l
va
mo
re
s
It
.
ir
fa
un
ly
nt
emmine
d
ul
wo
t
bu
,
me
co
in
c
si
ba
s
t'
en
pi
ci
re
e
th
to
on
ti
di
ad
l
ia
nt
te
any po
s,
ed
ne
l
ma
ni
mi
r
he
or
s
hi
r
fo
g
in
id
ov
pr
in
y
it
il
ib
ex
fl
re
mo
w
allo
al
ci
So
y
hl
nt
mo
r
ei
th
in
n
io
ct
du
re
a
without penalizing them by
of
ny
ma
of
at
th
as
ll
we
as
g,
in
It is my feel
Security benefits.
e
th
is
n
io
ct
ri
st
re
ir
fa
un
is
th
that the removal of
our citizens,
ied
pr
be
w
la
ng
ti
is
ex
e
th
in
s
on
si
vi
re
re
tu
fu
l
al
h
ic
wh
on
basis up
is
o
wh
n,
ma
wo
or
n
ma
a
y
wh
on
as
re
no
ly
te
lu
so
ab
is
e
er
Th
cated.
pca
e
ar
ey
th
if
d
ze
li
na
pe
be
ld
ou
sh
,
ty
ir
cu
Se
al
ci
So
g
in
iv
ce
re
now
ox
0:
00
,
$5
ox
00
$5
be.
it
r
he
et
wh
,
me
co
in
r
ei
th
g
in
nt
me
le
pp
su
able of
.
st
mu
a
ly
te
ni
fi
de
is
em
it
is
Th
$50,000 per year additional.
ll
we
e
ar
u
yo
as
,
an
Pl
ty
ri
The present Social Secu
s
it
in
d
te
or
pp
su
is
h
ic
wh
m
ra
og
pr
e
nc
ra
su
in
an
ly
mp
si
is
aware,
s
nd
fu
e
es
th
y
wh
on
as
re
no
is
e
er
Th
s.
nd
fu
e
at
iv
pr
by
entirety
f
oo
pr
on
up
nd
la
r
ou
of
n
ze
ti
ci
y
er
ev
to
e
bl
la
ai
av
be
t
no
should
t;
es
qu
re
al
rm
fo
or
ed
ne
on
st
re
ot
nn
ca
on
si
ci
de
e
Th
.
65
of age
w.
la
of
it
ir
sp
re
ti
en
e
th
s
it defeat
if it does,
ur
yo
th
wi
e
su
is
ke
ta
s,
ll
Mi
Congressman
I would also,
se
ea
cr
in
an
to
ng
ri
er
ef
(r
d
ne
er
nc
co
re
we
u
yo
as
r
fa
as
,
at
th
remark
in
be
y
ma
s
hi
"T
s)
nd
Fu
ry
su
ea
Tr
l
ra
ne
Ge
of
e
us
e
th
by
d
e
t
a
i
substant
u
yo
As
."
it
y
bu
to
y
ad
re
e
it
qu
t
no
..
".
re
u'
yo
at
th
t
the future" bu
a
on
is
d
rl
wo
r
ei
th
,
ns
ze
ti
ci
or
ni
se
r
ou
of
ny
ma
so
r
fo
must know,
me
co
be
t
no
ll
wi
e"
ur
ut
"f
ur
yo
,
em
th
of
er
mb
nu
e
rg
la
a
r
fo
"now" basis;
a reality.
in the haze
it
help is to come,
personal expedience
If
of
is
It
my
own
feeling
and
must be immediately,
or partisan politics.
that
too
much
time
has
not
lost
,
been
lost
r
fo
k
ea
sp
I
at
th
el
fe
I
.
ed
ne
nt
ge
ur
st
mo
is
th
in
ng
ti
ac
already in
e
th
of
h
dt
ea
br
d
an
th
ng
le
e
th
ut
ho
ug
ro
th
ns
ze
ti
ci
of
ns
many millio
.
st
pa
ng
lo
s
ha
n
io
at
in
st
ra
oc
pr
r
fo
me
ti
e
th
at
th
y
sa
I
en
nation wh
at
wh
e
in
tl
ou
ly
al
on
rs
pe
to
s
ou
xi
an
st
mo
be
d
ul
wo
I
,
re
si
If you so de
ng
ti
is
ex
e
th
to
t
en
in
rt
pe
s
rm
fo
re
ed
ed
ne
e
th
of
me
so
be
I consider to
d,
ul
wo
I
at
th
er
tt
ma
is
th
on
d
te
ic
nv
co
ly
ng
ro
st
so
am
I
structure.
my
il
ta
de
to
e
te
it
mm
Co
ur
yo
re
fo
be
ar
pe
ap
d
an
el
av
tr
at my expense,
.
sh
wi
ur
yo
be
it
ld
ou
sh
feelings on this dilemma,
A
[xerROo}
fCOPY
Ph nant
a
werk
{
§
ea
YEN
OTE
LERO
LI
i
orcabmralcacme
en
eae \
1 XM!
a
wn
Honorable Wilber
April
17,:1967
Page
Mills,
D.
Mills
3
when
I
think
that
that
I state
the
you
must
agree
Government's
me,
with
Congressman
responsibility
first
is
forget that in serving
Let us not, for one moment,
to its citizens.
we are laying the firm foundation for
the needs of our people today,
Their problems will not be easy, but they
all future generations.
will be more approachable
today.
of our problems
because
we
have
squarely
Sincerely,
PJP:iv
ee
|
|
i
|
\
|
if
1 ree’
_ peepee
7
IO Ca
mr,
[xERO|
%
[xERe
seat OEE
;
i
poet
¢
KERO |
COPhY |
at
met
the
challenge
™
Crass OF SERVICE
| This is a fast message
}
unless its-deferred chare
acter is indicated by the
proper symbol.
i
.
W.
P.
MARSHALL
CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD
“TELE
|
GRAM
R.
_
W.
[Nts
McFALL
PRESIDENT
Night Leer
The filing time shown in tha Anta lina an Anmastic hss is LOCAL TMF ar nnint of origin. Time of receipt is LOCAL TIME at point of destination
TSO
CTA
“
>
WHO ==
(377;
JUN
|
sity:
:
|
eo:
59
S—
pi
‘e
7P
6%
26
E
US
HO
E
IT
WH
E
TH
UX
=W
TCT WA330 GOVT PD
FWALTER
.
|
REUTIER» C ARE THE ODORE ¢ REUTHER
|
FLORAL AVE WHEELING WVE RE
‘sof
» RE PORT BLY =
|
|
MY
De
SA
RY
VE
Is
S
ES
LN
IL
E
AV
GR
'S
THE NEWS OF YOUR FATHER
:
Y
AN
R
FO
ME
ON
LL
CA
N
CA
U
YO
D
AN
TH
BO
U
YO
PRAYERS ARE WITH
ASSIS TANC Ee | KNOW HOW MUCH YOUR FATHER WILL BE COM OR TED :
BY YOUR PRESENCEe HIS PRIDE IN YOU 1S CONFIRMED AGAIN =i
RECENT COURAGEOUS AND EFFECTIVE EFFORTS ON YOUR COUN TRYYS
BEHALFe
SECRETARY
WIRTZ
SHARES
MY GREAT
BE ABLE TO SEE IT THROUGH DESPITE
I.
YOU HAVE ALL OUR SYMPATHY
HOPE
THAT
YOU
WILL
THIS FAMILY TRAGEDYe |
AND ENCOUR AGEME NTs
AS DOES YOUR
DEAR MOTHER WHOM | KNOW WILL FIND YOU A TOWER OF STRENGTH
“WU1201 (R2- 65)
‘
THE COMPANY
oe
APPRECIATE
SUGGESTIONS
FROM ITS PATRONS
CONCERNING
ITS SERVICE.
Ja
.
CLAss OF SERVICE
This is a fast message
unless itsdeferred character is indicated b the
proper symbol.
WESTERN
W. P. MARSHALL
CHAIRMAN
OF
THE
BOARD
©
TELE
GR
A
UNION &
M
;
SYM BOLS
Day Letter
NL=Nightr Letter
R. W. McFALL
International.
LT==Letter Telegram
PRESIDENT
The filing time shown in the date line on domestic telegrams is LOCAL TIME at point of origin. Time of receipt is LOCAL TIME at point of destination
3
|
¥/
AT
THIS
TIME=
LYNDON
WU1201 (R2-65)
THE
COMPANY
BJ OHNSON=
WILL
APPRECIATE
SUGGESTIONS
FROM
ITS
PATRONS
CONCERNING
ITS
_
SERVICE.
- Item sets